The thing is that a lot of these false premises rely on drawing comparisons between two programs, which the stim kind of refers to in the first sentence but DOES NOT get into how to actually compare two programs, but only talks about comparing the same program on two different computers, which is where I got caught

Honestly surprised I only got a fucking -3

lolll I bet you added THE ONLY because of PT 102, Section 2, Q23

I think the real trick here is seeing the appearance of the conditional: someone who likes potatoes hence likes turnips is not the same as someone who likes turnips hence likes potatoes (obviously), but this is hidden pretty well.

Fuck's sake I picked B knowing it was kind of weak but I just completely discounted C

I hope lead seal poisoning befalls whoever came up with this

I'm just gonna pick an answer and move tf on

Pretty sure seeing the correct answer for this took years off my lifespan

got me good fs

I hate how I immediately understand the correct answer choice the second I see that I've made the correct selection without even watching the video

ok i guess in retrospect E is quite obvious but I'm still wondering about A, am I just too nitpicky with the examples

Confused about Q3, I picked C, because idk the passage didn't specifically address a case where GNP is lower for a country but its human indicators suggest that its doing better. tHE Two examples we have:

- Country A has higher GNP than B, but have the same indicators

- Country A has high GNP, but wealth is not spread out at all.

Whereas for the correct answer choice E, I don't feel like the passage did enough to explain HOW specifically nations can address their improvements, aside from "ensuring improvements in conditions measured by human indicators." Idk I think I was expecting something too specific, can anyone tell me what I'm missing.

embarrassing -3 on this im truly cooked

same, and I ended up going for A even though I didn't really like A.....

I came to the exact same conclusion and I was expecting something like "the whole IS determined by its components", but I went with E anyway cuz none of the others made sense.

I find it really irritating how RC passages can have an answer for MSS which would be torn apart if it was used in a LR question. Like the D for Q17...

There's no way this question is a one-star bruh

-3 in a passage that to be honest I felt I had a good grasp of with the test less than a month from now..... i think i might be finished

-2 initially, -4 after blind review because I gaslit myself into thinking that 21 and 23 wer wrong :)

My gripe with 22 is that I saw both C and D, I initially like D because I didn't feel like "misrepresent" was the right wording for it instead of something like "misunderstood". But I guess I'm the fool for overthinking with semantics :/

A "people of Beethoven's time did not consume mercury for other purposes" would've been nice

My problem with this question is that there's nothing establishing that the formation of microdiamonds indicates the END of the formation of the crust. Like as far as we know, the formation of microdiamonds could indicate the forming of the Earth crust ending X amount of time after the microdiamonds??

If this question feels more like a "which of the following AC's would most explain above statements."

I foolishly picked E, because I thought "depend" means correlates, as in HTE would at least to some extent contribute to HP, when in reality "depend" here means "necessitate".

Honestly I realized not all shows depended on funding from ads, so that immediately narrowed it down to B and E because if their premises.

I thought A was the correct answer, because it draws a conclusion about people who believe conviction is sufficient to resign, based on a conclusion about people who believe conviction is necessary to resign smh.