@KatrinaFurman I am literally in the exact same boat and I’ve been studying for a while. My blind reviews are coming back at like 165 but I routinely PT at 150-157. I wonder if I should just start taking a PT everyday since I am taking the test in October?? I also have the same GPA and affordability issues - and Chicago is on my short list of where I want to practice so maybe I’ll see you somewhere up there lol ???

I got this wrong because I interpreted "normal-looking" to mean normal relative to what most people are exposed to having seen before, such as a species of insect that also exists today, such as a mosquito, as opposed to something more exotic looking, such as what could be an actual, ancient insect that humans have not been exposed to "normally".... I almost picked the correct answer and then talked myself out of it for this very reason and chose A instead because of the relationship between vendor integrity and authenticity??

How - seriously, how - can avoiding dairy logically be assumed to have "negative consequences"? Please don't say calcium: there are plenty of ways to get calcium, and the stimulus makes no mention of calcium whatsoever.

"might/may also have negative health consequences" <-- no. This is not vegan bias, I promise. I just truly don't see how A is a valid answer. It goes beyond the scope of logic.

@soleluna883 where does it say they "were wearing seat belts"? It just says it was the law - it doesn't say it was being followed?

It's A