Hi all, I've been studying for the past few months and have been seeing no progress. I am placing as much emphasis as I can on blind review now and then watching lessons on the issues that I see that I am struggling with. I'm worried I am not doing enough drills to learn enough. For context, I work full time and can maybe devote 2.5 hours a day, six times a week. What is a realistic amount of drills that I should be completing, or would that depend more on my understanding of the material?
BnC
- Joined
- Jun 2026
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
LSAT
Not provided
Goal score: 165
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
Not provided
Discussions
BnC
Thursday, Jun 11
The diagram that I made does not quite add up to the method of reasoning presented here, but it helped me get to the correct answer. Could anyone confirm whether this train of thought is correct or if it was just a coincidence?
My diagram looked for the stimulus looked like this: P and A -> not M, Contrapositive: M -> not P or not A
After seeing this, my thought process was that just because Maria and Leon meet part of the Necessary Condition, we can't confirm that they meet the other half of the Necessary Condition.
The way I was able to reach the correct AC was by thinking by thinking that the stimulus assumes that being less likely to eat fats (eating no dairy) we will reach the same results as avoiding fats all together. This led me to think that we don't know for sure if no dairy = good health, so theres a possibility that there are bad consequences so then A is correct. For others does this seem to be a reasonable thought process? I was able to eliminate the other answer choices but want to confirm that the reasoning that led me to AC A isn't going too far.