I REALLY relate to this!! To be honest, I am just taking my time reading the answer choices, I make sure not to go faster than I can comprehend. I think there are going to be patterns we can find within the answer choices, and wrong answers will eventually begin to stick out. I think it’s good at the beginning to go slow, really try to break the answer choices down to comprehend them, and then as you practice more and more you will slowly speed up. It is better to take your time, comprehend the material, and not worry about speed until you notice that you’re able to start getting through the answer choices faster, then start to be more concerned about speed and timing yourself. (My only credential is that I used to teach a really hard AP class with a higher than global average pass rate lol)

Does anyone have any advice on balancing making assumptions when evaluating answer choices in the weakening questions? I actually thought C strengthened the argument because there were so many errors to find in the first place, looking back I see it weakens the argument because mistakes are still being made and they’re finding more mistakes when editing. I didn’t choose it because I also thought we can’t assume this because it isn’t mentioned in the stimulus. Thanks!