User Avatar
CeliaAcosta
Joined
Aug 2025
Subscription
Live

Admissions profile

LSAT
Not provided Goal score: 165
CAS GPA
3.98
1L START YEAR
2027

Discussions

PrepTests ·
PT141.S1.P1.Q4
User Avatar
CeliaAcosta
1 hour ago

For B I got thrown off by the word "flourish" because the last paragraph just mentioned smaller species surviving the catastrophe. BUT the author says that "mammals fared relatively well" which means that they actually did FLOURISH!!!!!

1
PrepTests ·
PT141.S1.P1.Q6
User Avatar
CeliaAcosta
2 hours ago

E is right because the author explains what would happen if constructionists were to be correct (the survival of every species are due to such adaptation) and then explains how nature proves those constructionists wrong.

1
PrepTests ·
PT141.S1.P1.Q5
User Avatar
CeliaAcosta
2 hours ago

I'll just blame English not being my first language LOL. I thought Empathic had something to do with the author being empathetic, which is why I went with B since it made more sense. I'm still laughing about this one.

1
PrepTests ·
PT141.S1.P1.Q4
User Avatar
CeliaAcosta
2 hours ago

For D. Remember that Just because we know a quality or characteristic of smaller species, that does not mean that the opposite applied to bigger species. For example, just because smaller species were able to survive, does not mean that they larger species are unable to survive.

1
PrepTests ·
PT125.S1.P4.Q27
User Avatar
CeliaAcosta
4 days ago

For B, remember that at first, the author mentions that when cohesiveness is low, individuals might stay quiet out of fear of recrimination. Hence, even if High cohesiveness might have it's pros (critical thinking) and cons (Groupthink), it is true that a high degree of cohesiveness can examine decisions more critically as they have more freedom to express themselves. P.S. this is the note I wrote to myself, hopefully it helps some of you. THIS QUESTION WAS BRUTAL BUT WE GOT THIS!

2
PrepTests ·
PT149.S4.Q8
User Avatar
CeliaAcosta
Sunday, May 10

This one threw me off at first but here is how it clicked lol. The argument says that the fish changed pattern WHEN the female gave him feedback on their color. Well, someone could come in and say that they always change colors regardless of feedback. Which is why A supports the argument. It illustrates how fish act based on the female's reaction and not so much a random female.

1

Hello future attorneys,

I wanted to see if there are any students in the Pennsylvania area (Lancaster, Elizabethtown, Mount Joy, York, or Harrisburg) who want to form an in-person LSAT study group.

The goal would be to meet once or twice a week at a public library or coffee shop to review practice tests, and stay consistent in our prep.

Meeting in person helps with:

  • Accountability and staying on track

  • Real-time discussion and deeper understanding

  • Learning different strategies from others

  • Creating a focused study environment

I’m currently scoring in the mid-150s and aiming for a 165+. I’m planning to take the LSAT in June, so I want to stay fully locked in over the next two months.

If this is something you're interested in, please let me know and we can coordinate.

CeliaAcosta’s In - person (PA) study group
User AvatarUser Avatar
2 members  ·  Last active last month
1
User Avatar
CeliaAcosta
Monday, Apr 6

I would love to. I'm in PA too!

Currently in the mid 150s aiming for a 165+

1
User Avatar
CeliaAcosta
Monday, Apr 6

I would love to!

2
PrepTests ·
PT133.S2.Q4
User Avatar
CeliaAcosta
Monday, Apr 6

But even if B is true, the argument is still questionable because it confuses the amount of money spent with the value something it's given.

1
User Avatar
CeliaAcosta
Saturday, Sep 6, 2025

my question is, why is the last one different than the ones we did in the past?

If the record sells well, then you will be famous.

records sells well  ---> famous 

/Famous ---> /record did not sell well

Why are we now adding (W ←s→ /F) SOME if the sentence does not imply a conditional relationship????

0/5 by the way! :((((((

4
User Avatar
CeliaAcosta
Friday, Aug 29, 2025

I had a similar experience with LSAT demon. Giving 7sage a try. It's been a week.

1

Confirm action

Are you sure?