@charmaine189 I think your second bullet point is still correct, as it's the opposite statement of "People should feel more responsible for military invasions". However, I think this creates more confusion than needed.

Since the "quality of comparison" uses the phrase more responsible instead of less responsible, I think it's easier to stay in line with the more side of things.

Just my two cents. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

@Gregmjr I don't think that "But this is not a sustainable, long term solution" is a sub conclusion due to the fact the last sentence does not entirely support that claim. He answers this question around the 14 minute mark of the video.

Please correct me if I'm wrong.

@ChaseHatfield I think you nailed it. "Context = Extra information related and important to but not a part of the argument."

Simply put, a premise is a core part of the argument, but context is not. It is just related and important.

- I am also no expert. Please correct me if I am wrong.

@kdumalo If anything I was thinking it might be a good place to start while analyzing a question. Possibly highlighting indicator words or phrases stick out. And then using method 1 or 2 to verify the claim is actually the conclusion or premise.

@AprilSim I would love a more qualified person to correct me, but I have an idea as to what the answer may be.

Support = Increase likelihood of truth.

Premise: Tigers are very aggressive and can cause serious injuries to people.

Conclusion: Not every mammal is suitable to keep as a pet.

If the conclusion is supported (catcher) by the premise then the order is correct. If the conclusion is not supported by the premise then the order is incorrect. The premise in this order increases the likelihood of truth. Whereas the other order does not.

LOCKED IN