I'm going to name my first kid JY if I get a high LSAT score

I didn't pick it, but I just realized that they added (D) to trick people who might've thought that "displace" has something to do with location... these sneaky buggers

"not true" and "inability" in the same sentence tripped me up. I notice they do this a lot like they will say "we don't disagree that a decrease is unnecessary" .... this type of one-directional flow and then a completely opposite direction flow of the same sentence is really tough to understand when you have like 1.20 per question, give or take.

Does LEAST MSS function the same way as EXCEPT MSS questions?

#help (Added by Admin)

(B) is also tricky because they say the owls eat the rodents, at first I didn't see how that could weaken it, but I kept it as a possibility because it was close to my pre-phrase. I realized after eliminating the others that I read the stimmy too fast that I missed the last few words where it says "and other rodents" and then I was able to make that connection. These last creators really know what they're doing and how to send people for a ride :/

At first, I read (A) as saying "decreased" instead of "increased", let's say it had said decreased, would that weaken the argument? #help

I was stuck between (B) and (D) and I ended up choosing (D). The reason is that for (B) I thought that when it said "powerful gravitational force" in the AC, I questioned it by saying "how do we know that gravitational force is enough to pull the planet", and so I crossed it out and chose (D). This technique of questioning answer choices helps me eliminate wrong answers, but in this case, it made me cross out the right answer. Does anyone else do this?

#help (Added by Admin)

I understood answer choice (D) to mean "the cod fish feed on the seal's food, so the seal's have nothing left to eat so they just eat the cod"... it worked out in the end because I selected it, but I thought all the others were not weakening in any way. My main take away from this is that (E) seemed like a classic trap answer because it's something we are used to seeing "maybe this thing occurred before this thing" which is a classic way to weaken something... but they worded it in a way that would strengthen the argument.

The only reason I picked (B) is because it was talking about non-mammals, but on the LSAT and future questions like this, is it acceptable to have that as the only reason to pick an answer?

#help (Added by Admin)

This one was tough, when I eliminated the ones I could and got to (E), I thought I made a mistake eliminating the other ones because it felt too strong and only contained information about artificial fibers. I ended up choosing (E). The process of elimination was helpful in this one.

I forgot under timed condition that I was supposed to make the conclusion valid for this question and I thought "will" in (D) was too strong. Hopefully I don't make the same mistake moving forward.

I didn't see how instinct and noninstinct were the only 2 possibilities, which made this question way harder than it needed to be, ended up spending too much time on this and got it wrong in BR and still didn't make sense. I get it now.