Self-study
I haven't studied since I last took the LSAT in Jan this year, and thus I am unsure if my analytics reflect my current understanding.
Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
CountCandy
- Joined
- Jun 2025
- Subscription
- Live
Admissions profile
LSAT
171
CAS GPA
3.88
1L START YEAR
2027
Applications
Arizona State
Applied
Arizona State
Applied
Berkeley
Rejected
Berkeley
Rejected
Boston University
Rejected
Boston University
Rejected
Columbia
Waitlisted
Columbia
Waitlisted
Cornell
Waitlisted
Cornell
Waitlisted
Duke
Waitlisted
Duke
Waitlisted
Georgetown
Waitlisted
Georgetown
Waitlisted
Harvard
Rejected
Harvard
Rejected
Michigan
Waitlisted
Michigan
Waitlisted
Northwestern
Rejected
Northwestern
Rejected
NYU
Waitlisted
NYU
Waitlisted
UCLA
Waitlisted
UCLA
Waitlisted
UNC
Rejected
UNC
Rejected
UPenn
Waitlisted
UPenn
Waitlisted
UT Austin
Rejected
UT Austin
Rejected
UVA
Rejected
UVA
Rejected
Vanderbilt
Waitlisted
Vanderbilt
Waitlisted
WashU
Waitlisted
WashU
Waitlisted
Discussions
CountCandy
Monday, Sep 8, 2025
@rositamoro I just sent a request via chat. Hope to talk with you on discord!
I was wondering if anyone would be interested in regularly going through 3-5 star CausR and CondR questions. I have bee stuck at ~170 for a while now because of them and was hoping that maybe just talking to someone might help raise both our scores.
I live in the Phx area, so I guess most interaction would be digital.
Thank you for your time and I hope you have a great day!
Edit: Here is a discord link for anyone interested: https://discord.gg/tMr4A2wN
@EthanO I think the issue lies on the level of proof we need for this kind of question. While some questions like MSS or strength require that it be 100% correct, where we only need to 'contribute to a resolution' just needs to suggest the answer if not the answer itself. So while C does not guarantee a resolution, it opens a new set of questions that would (so it implies a possible resolution).