- Joined
- Oct 2025
- Subscription
- Core
Admissions profile
Applications
Discussions
Hi! I did not expect to write 2 posts a day, but I am a curious potato so I had to ask.
I noticed that some analysis of questions show the bar to fill all 5 squares, but the average people who get the score is really low, or the percentage of people who get this right is high.
Is this normal? Or are they in the middle of collecting data for more accuracy?
I got a question right that I thought to be hard, but when I saw the analytics I was very confused.
I just received a couple of messages from an account created less than an hour ago saying that they are giving me free tutoring.
When I saw the message my mind immediately thought this was some sort of a scam because it shared its whatsapp number area coded China.
Has anyone received anything like this?
I think George would have been so mad to hear Boris' response, so let me do him a favor and give the explanation that would not make George want to punch Boris in the face
It's because Michael Jackson started promoting ballroom dancing in 1994, and 65 percent of the population wanted to engage in anything MJ promoted
Hah
Title is self explanatory!
I like to practice active reading directly on the notes while I am blind reviewing my RC, and I was wondering if we could have different colours of fonts. Red, green, blue sounds ideal to me, but at least if we could have the colour the analysis has(that pinkish colour), that would be great!
I want to compare how my analysis is to the explanation, and if the sentences were in different colours, it would be more easier to stand out!
Below is just me showing you how I am currently taking notes. I thought it would be great if my low-res summary is written in a different colour.
How does this sound like?
139 -> 172 speaking. It took me 18 months to reach that score
I will make this very short and I really hope this advice helps(and I know it will)
1 PT a week is enough. For now, with just a few hours of learning the concept, you will easily reach the 150s. But I would not consider that much of a progress because the low to mid 150s is something you can easily reach even without learning the LSAT concepts.
I was stuck at 152 for a full year, but this is what I changed in my study plan:
Prioritize drilling & Blind reviewing(please write down your reasoning)& review your Blind Review(a lot of people miss this part when they are in their 150s)
When I do the Practice Test, I only Blind review, and that is pretty much it.
Once you feel comfortable drilling and get most questions right, from there, instead of doing drills, change that to 1 section a day and blind review that
Literally, this is it. Do not push yourself too much on this. LSAT is a test which Quantity does not win over quality, imo.
This post reminded me of my LSAT journey. Good luck! It will feel great once you reach the score you want.
The title itself is self-explanatory. I see how currently the test has been updated to the new LSAT form, but I want to know if 7sage is planning to apply that to blind reviews as well.
welp, you are not alone with that. when you have a GPA that sucks you gotta learn how to live with it. But I think Law school is good in that it gives you some breathing room by covering up your bad GPA with a great LSAT score. Its gonna work out don't worry
@Funky_Scholar
I saw your message!!! Thank you! Cannot wait for this to happen🩷
@afgriffith1469 If I share what I did, I tried to write as accurately as possible on why I was getting these questions wrong on my Wrong Answer Journal. While I was reviewing all the questions, I realized that the reasons why I was getting such questions were redundant. For instance, I was having a hard time finding what the assumption was in weakening/strengthening, and I was constantly misreading the answer choice in main conclusion. When I saw that there was a pattern in my mistakes, I made a database to put down why I was getting answers wrong and that helped me improve a lot in terms of avoiding little mistakes(that saves you some points)
It kinda looks like this for reference.
I don't think you have to do this, but in my experience I was really sucking at it(like I started with a 139) so I really had to figure out what the problem was and this is what I chose to do. My point is that you really have to know what mistakes you are making so that you can make a game plan accordingly
@Thomaskmm30 I made an excel sheet that looks like this. you can take a look at how the sheet looks like when you scroll down. I first also tried writing things down my journal, but I realized I was not looking at them, so I needed real numbers to see what the real issue was.
Ofcourse, I know you can do this
First of all, was June the first try? if not, I don't see why you are cooked. Even if that not the case, I dont see why that would be a problem.
I know how annoying this test is, and trust me, I was on the same boat. I wrote a whole novel on another post of how I was in the 150s after a full year of studying. I think the best advice I can give you first is take a deep breath.
Before just constantly grinding, what is really important is that you recognize the type of questions you are getting wrong and more importantly, WHY. If you do not know exactly whats stopping you from getting a high score, its gonna be hard to improve.
In my experience, while I was looking at my wrong answer journal, I realized that the reasons I was getting such questions wrong were redundant, so I ended up making a database to find out what the problem was, and I did figure out what the problem was.
Just by getting rid of the mistakes you are making, you are gonna improve your score by 5 points. Trust me. I did that too and I am using my tactics to my fellow study group members for the September LSAT
Hi, I really hope this helps because it did to me. If you are scoring around -9 I think you can improve just by doing a quick diagnosis of how you are performing. Here are the three VERY important questions I think you should ask yourself to get you to a better score:
Don't even think about any stimulus. When you look at the question, do you know exactly what type of question it is? Necessary Assumption? Main Conclusion? Most Strongly Supported?
If so, do you know exactly what the specific task is for each type of question? Do you have any problems succeeding the task?
Do you know exactly why you are getting those questions wrong? If so, why is it? Are you misreading the answer choice? Do you not know what to do?
-> I have been studying the test for quite a while now, and I improved by 10 points once all the three questions were unequivocally answered. Not only should you review the questions you missed, you also have to understand why you are getting them wrong. If you have that clearly in your mind, then it gets easier to build a strategy accordingly
Good luck!


I figured. It's funny that you would receive that message too. Hahahah like they are not even looking at the labels