Thank god reading the comments made me feel better. I also was confused about how initially I thought there were no right answer.

But I guess the question asked which answer choice has the MOST support, it should be an answer that relatviely supports the argument most.

C would then fit in to that category because we only have one thing to assume for it to be correct, that the Parthenon is a Grecian sculpture.

I guess the problem that I have here is that I don't have a solid concept of what an "evidence" should be, which is why I chose C. The explanation in third paragraph of Passage 3 was to me the evidence part.

How do I get out of this rabbit hole? Any tips?

For A, where can I find the part where the author "espouses" a general view? To me, I only see principles being introduced without any espousals.

Was there a key word that supports the first part of answer choiceA?

@Jsonf wow you nailed it. thanks!

S.O.S!

So I should ask since I am confused with why B is incorrect.

I figured that the reasoning structure for the stimulus is suggesting a conclusion based on what happened in the past.

So my first attempt was to find out similar cases, which to me, flipping the coin six times was an event that happened in the past.

Am I wrong? what would be another way to explain it?

I think in J.Y's explantion he talks about the second half of the sentence, but I'm not convinced yet.

Can anyone help?

Was this question so east that nobody had any questions..

because I am curious where I can find the clue for "confident" endorsement

5/5

but more of a 4/4 because the last question was already covered in one of the lessons.

Regarless, one of the questions was a super difficult one, and its crazy that I got that right.

Good way to finish a lesson!

Actually, I dont know why but my cat tends to look to the direction I point to.

Can we all appreciate how funny and well-understanding the examples are?

The last example about bedsheets and cheese consumption was just too good to forget

@ChadC this gave me a giggle

Is it wrong for me to be critical of thinking why produce should be only meaning almonds?

I get that context wise it should be referring to almonds, but to me the logic makes more sense if I don't confine it to almonds

@Aliza GGG This is a lot better than the example given in the course

@WillowBound2 this was so easy to understand. Thanks! You are amazing

I assume that the concept sufficient and necessary is irrelevant for now?

@Vernon L Painter Ah!! I get it. makes a lot more sense.

Thank you!

Wouldn't there be 2 conclusions for Q2??

Hermes watches the Olympics

and

Hermes likes to eat Wasabi?

@mhenwohl OHHHHH wait I read this a couple of timesand I think I am getting to the point.

You are amazing thanks!!

I think you guys all know this but I have to ask.

Should I treat what comes after "requires" the same as "necessary"?

Just had a quick question. Might be a stupid one

I see how the words for group 3 need at least two clauses, and words of group 4 can start with one clause. Am I right?? Would this be a right way to understand this

@CecileJudy Thats amazing!!!! Lets goo

it also took a good amount of time for me to get this right

For Q5, I don;t know why but I really am a bit confused with what this is saying. So I thought of another way to think of the two comparisons to be

not had been accustomed to maintain

vs

accustomed to maintain

would this be a fair way to interpret it the sentence?

When politicians resort to personal attacks, many editorialists criticize these attacks but most voters pay them scant attention. Everyone knows such attacks will end after election day...

In Question 4, is it weird to understand "them" as the politicians..... am I that bad at understanding the context...

Wouldn't "There are only two ways to get the pass" be an assumption?

so does that mean the less assumptions are needed in an argument, the stronger the statement is?

I see how a lot of people are confused with the issue that I also have, but reading the comments are somehow not hitting the spot for me.

My question (also) is, how do we tell the difference between a premise and a conclusion? How should I train myself to pick the right one?