Self-paced
Hi yall - is there a way to create a drill of just your bookmarked LR questions?
Edbnapa
- Joined
- Mar 2026
- Subscription
- Live
Admissions profile
LSAT
Not provided
Goal score: 174
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
2027
Discussions
Hi Everyone, I am desperate for advice, tips or tricks, or words of encouragement, for how to get QUICKER at the test. I have been studying for over 3 months now, and I feel like I understand the questions/question types. I am just slow. Sometimes I have to reread a stimulus a couple times to fully understand it. Or I am not 100% confident on an answer so I look through the other options a little longer. My biggest obstacle currently is my speed (or lack thereof). It is veryyyy rare for me to answer a question at target time and EVEN RARER to answer under target time.
Looking forward to responses! Thanks yall!
Edbnapa
Wednesday, Apr 29
Hi Ethan, I find myself at a back and forth with the direction to take my personal statement. The overarching dilemma: whether to specialize the personal statement with an interest to a specific field of law (able to talk more in depth of my personal experiences and background with this route) OR taking a more generalized approach to show that I am open to multiple subfields (I am scared of being denied if I seem too set on one direction)?
Edbnapa
Monday, Apr 6
Straight up just got this one wrong because I didn't read "EXCEPT".... no wonder this one felt impossible to answer LOL
Edbnapa
Thursday, Apr 2
Answer choice A and B sound exactly the same in my head. Still can not decipher one from the other.
Edbnapa
Thursday, Mar 26
This question and the correct answer makes absolutely no sense to me. It goes against everything I've learned this far.
Edbnapa
Friday, Mar 13
The reason I didn't choose D is because of the verbiage in the answer choice: "offering an alternate explanation of the CORRELATION cited"
I thought because of the wording in the stimulus, "caused by" was indicating a casual relationship. Therefore, I thought answer D was a trick question answer choice.
Edbnapa
Thursday, Mar 12
Wait I'm confused!!
The skill builder before this said I couldn't group (or assume) "Commerical Pilots" and, "people who fly" together. But for Q#1, I am now allowed to assume and group together, "electric trucks" and "all trucks"? Someone please help lol.
Edbnapa
Thursday, Mar 12
Q#2 is slightly confusing. For the reason being that I was under the impression that (<-s->) you could interchange the inputs on either side of the arrows.
Therefore with that application, Q#2's conclusion could be: some surgeons could be vampires. Right??? Obviously, that conclusion doesn't make logistical sense, but if accepting the premises as true, that's what could be drawn (right??).
Please explain why there is no conclusion drawn from that question.
Edbnapa
Monday, Mar 9
I am slightly confused because didn't we just have a lesson on "and" being equivalent to, "and/or"? Please inform me if I am misunderstanding!
"what would you do if when you okay so he said yes would go" ahh question