@luka2020 But isn't that the opposite of what the argument is, It's saying that it's more worthwhile for tourists than for locals to rent from a dealership, but if they are almost never inconvenienced by the fees for taxis and transportation, wouldn't that weaken the claim that it's more worthwhile to rent from a dealership? Is my head on backward, or is this extremely confusing?

This question confuses me because getting to the main point of what someone is trying to say is also, for me at least, what they are trying to insinuate, which in this case seemed to be that ErgoTech copied the design of OCF's product. If what they are insinuating is that it's not a coincidence, then what other possibility could there possibly be? I mean, sure, there are endless possibilities, like OCF and ErgoTech collaborated and came up with the design together, or maybe the ideas magically appeared in both of the companies' designer teams' minds, which is very unlikely but still possible, I guess, but the stimulus never gets into any other kind of possibility and kind of leads the reader to believe the assumption of plagiarism. Am I missing anything, or was this question misleading to anyone else?

@nat.the.cat I literally assumed the same thing and thats what brought me to answer E. I swear they knew that the majority of people were going to confuse that. frickin LSATS MAN.

@aliegeaksu from my understanding there are more ways that a stimulus would constitute an argument, either it is trying to convince of the reader of something, or it must comprise of conclusion(s) that are supported by premise(s). if im wrong please correct me (im still learning just like you guys)

@THS same here bro i got exactly one month and feel like im about 1% prepared.