If C read "Some pharmaceutical companies are investing their resources on developing a vaccine for a novel coronavirus." would that also work? ive seen questions on the LSAT where i thought a some modifier was needed but the correct answer didn't read as I thought it would and I wonder if that applies here

Wouldn't D be a must be true?

I was leaning towards D, but expected that in order for it to be right, it would have to be less strong. I felt that it would've needed to be written like this instead "What people recall under hypnosis can depend to at least some extent on suggestion" or "Sometimes what people recall under hypnosis depends to at least some extent on suggestion". How is "to at least some extent" functioning here? Because all we know is about the film group, not the music group, so this AC seemed too strong.

I don't use the feature on here. I have a physical one, but don't really review it. I think the main thing that's good about it is taking notes.

Would C be considered a subsidiary conclusion?

I don't understand why E is incorrect. "This year, at least one film that won a prize at an international film festival was not shown at the Lac Nichoutec Film Festival."

The stimulus says that most of the films that won prizes at Lac Nichoutec won prizes at international film festivals. Key word most. so wouldn't this mean that at least one film that won a prize was not shown at the Lac Nichoutec festival, aka that it was not Canadian? Or maybe there isn't enough info in the stimulus to rule out that all films at the international festivals that won could've been Canadian??

I answered C right, but I just want to understand why E is incorrect.

Ugh, just had no idea what upholstered meant.

@MaxThompson What threw me off, and led me to choose D was the phrase "periods of up to ten years" , but I guess this phrase just modifies the record highs and not the fluctuations?

@ElizabethPadrnos Typo. I meant to say economic health not GNP.

If answer choice D was something more along the lines of an actual explanation of WHAT country f considers to be a better indicator of GNP, could it then have been the correct answer?

@zleche THANK YOU

I saw on Reddit that there's some way on 7 sage to request a new explanation to be offered, but I'm not sure if I do that through this discussion. If there's a specific button I'm not seeing it. I'm not satisfied with the explanation video for not giving an adequate reason for why C is incorrect.

I don't understand...wouldn't bacteria in number one be the predicate-object?

I chose D because I thought it must be significant that the author was overlooking the non high-risk industries. I thought for weakeners you should see the assumption the author is making and that can destroy the argument. However, after review, it makes sense that A is correct, since the stimulus overlooks the possibility that another factor other than legislation could've contributed to the increased worker safety.