There is a discrepancy between the analysis/lightbulb and J.Y.’s explanation of Lutsina’s stance on answer choice E.

I personally agree with J.Y’s take in the video.

The language used for the analysis/lightbulb of AC E has me confused: To Lutsina, imagining new arrangements can lead to better criticism, but that doesn’t mean anything is required to be effective.

Any thoughts?

In the weeds here just trying to work on improving my perception of support and understanding these complicated claims!

There is a discrepancy between the analysis/lightbulb and J.Y.’s explanation of Lutsina’s stance on answer choice E.

I personally agree with J.Y’s take in the video.

The language used for the analysis/lightbulb of AC E has me confused: To Lutsina, imagining new arrangements can lead to better criticism, but that doesn’t mean anything is required to be effective.

Any thoughts?

As a part of my practice I have been ranking the answer choices on the spectrum of support and comparing to the explanation. For answer choice a, I had placed it as weakly anti-supported. I am still working on developing an accurate perception of support. Here is to hoping!

@nknapp120301 I needed this comment!