not sure why but this is clicking really easily!! so happy to finally get a concept without having to go through the motions and question my sense of reality
I feel like the LSAT just adds words and longer sentences to trip overwhelm you as a reader when questions increase in level. The way I broke this down was identifying the core what they were saying. Lutsina, is saying furutrisitc science is a richer source than conventional fiction and Priscilla is saying vice versa.
Wow, I had a wrong answer chosen for the longest time but I had to re-read and then I got the right answer! 56 seconds over but I am learning that right answer > time, for now!
The wordiness of this question made it seem way worse than it actually was. Once you realize the conclusion/PAI is the last sentence, everything made more sense lol.
I got this right! But i'm always over time. I'm trying not to worry about it tho given we're still getting foundations and I want to work on understanding more than time
So just to clarify: if an answer choice contains information that hasn't been discussed in the stimulus or information that we cannot determine whether it is true/could be true/could be false, then that answer choice can be dismissed as not being the POI?
The correct answer choice needs to be one that must be true for one person and must be false for the other person? (as we saw on the MSS Must-be-supported scale?)
Is it safe to say that if both speakers have conclusions, a good strategy is to disregard the premises and hunt for the AC based off the conclusions? After getting through what Priscilla was saying at first, I finished the stimulus, went hunting and referenced only the conclusions of both speakers and got the AC correct.
Can anyone confirm that it is a good strategy.
0
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Hold on there, you need to slow down.
We love that you want post in our discussion forum! Just come back in a bit to post again!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
124 comments
not sure why but this is clicking really easily!! so happy to finally get a concept without having to go through the motions and question my sense of reality
Got it right on the BR, totally flunked the first attempt.
Nope. That was awful.
took me 10 minutes but I got it right!
got it right! :)
i got this right but i HATE the way it was written.
I feel like the LSAT just adds words and longer sentences to trip overwhelm you as a reader when questions increase in level. The way I broke this down was identifying the core what they were saying. Lutsina, is saying furutrisitc science is a richer source than conventional fiction and Priscilla is saying vice versa.
Ended up eliminating all of the options then I had to reread the stimulus and I got it.
I did not like this question
I understood Lutsina portion but Priscilla first sentence really tripped me up
Wow, I had a wrong answer chosen for the longest time but I had to re-read and then I got the right answer! 56 seconds over but I am learning that right answer > time, for now!
YESSIR 1:21 only over by 11 seconds. Dissected it by trying to just understand the difference in these perspectives, and where they would butt heads.
It took me several minutes to answer this one, I got it right but I had to write through it.
The wording on this question was actual hell. I got it right, but it took me 7 minutes.
The wordiness of this question made it seem way worse than it actually was. Once you realize the conclusion/PAI is the last sentence, everything made more sense lol.
Huh?
I got this right! But i'm always over time. I'm trying not to worry about it tho given we're still getting foundations and I want to work on understanding more than time
Check the conclusions!!!! Whew I think the extra words are there to exhaust you honestly...
So just to clarify: if an answer choice contains information that hasn't been discussed in the stimulus or information that we cannot determine whether it is true/could be true/could be false, then that answer choice can be dismissed as not being the POI?
The correct answer choice needs to be one that must be true for one person and must be false for the other person? (as we saw on the MSS Must-be-supported scale?)
What role does the that in the beginning of the sentence play other than making the sentence harder to read?
Got it right, but, took me waaaaaay too long. Went over +2:44, yikes lol
For Priscilla's argument what do they mean by radically different ones in answer choice e
This question was interesting because we can eliminate four of the answer choices just by reading the first argument. Dang!
#Feedback. I feel like some of these are over-explained.
Priscilla's first long sentence messed me all up!
Is it safe to say that if both speakers have conclusions, a good strategy is to disregard the premises and hunt for the AC based off the conclusions? After getting through what Priscilla was saying at first, I finished the stimulus, went hunting and referenced only the conclusions of both speakers and got the AC correct.
Can anyone confirm that it is a good strategy.