@JamesFoleno I think it's safe to assume that anyone who is not Yerxes is less qualified because of the second sentence.

@okhan815 I know I am super late, but for anyone going to see this, I would say it's super helpful when you read a flawed question and find the flaw without looking at the ac. C was a good one to sway your thinking if you didn't identify the flaw. When I got to the conclusion, I thought, wait, we can't compare professionals and students; professionals have earned their right and wouldn't need the books to learn something new or review, but to (possibly) double-check, students are still learning. E aligned the most with this idea.

@KyraBrown I am also interested and would love to know the rates as well!

Sorry about this! Perhaps the remote exam is what available?

@Khan1 When you create a diagram, it'll read like this: 

GH → Kill prey

GH → High MFR

Wild Cats → GH

Domestic cats (s) → GH

Match up the first and last premise and you’ll get Domestic cats (s) → GH → Kill prey. So we can determine that some domestic cats can kill up to half of their body weight. I hope that makes sense!

@MichaelWright This was super helpful for me too! Thanks a ton!

So E is wrong because appeared ≠ published?

I skip the BR for untimed because the BR is meant to be a second look at questions without the stress of time. So, because it's already untimed, the time factor isn't a hindrance.

this was def a hard question...

@TishaBrahmbhatt I know this is late, but I wanted to add to the last person's response for future reference. The stimulus is speaking of people not being aware of themselves, and because of this, they have poor judgment. Elementary school students just dislike arithmetic, but that doesn't illustrate a lack of self-awareness or impaired judgment. But the other answer choices do show a lack of self-awareness within the subject that will cause them to not accurately decide on something.

I think they paused doing them. I have been on the look out for them as well

@kwangleestuff519 your explanation helped so much. Thank you!

@Giga Thanks so much for explaining!

I was wondering the same thing

@Giga Can you explain what you mean by changing the hypothetical?

Yes, I review my wag before every study session

How do admission officers attempt to read applications with little to no bias?

@littlehoot I thought I was the only one, I def agree

@ColinErickson I thought I was the only one, I went through the same exact thing with this passage. It's good to know I'm not alone!