- Joined
- Oct 2025
- Subscription
- Core
Admissions profile
Discussions
In the question stem, we don't get a "if true" or "assuming the answer choices are true" type qualifier. Is that just fair to assume for all flaw question?
Hi 7Sage Fam,
Just want to ask how yall have been splitting your prep time between LR and RC. I haven’t done much RC but I think I’m starting from a pretty good base (-6 avg per section). Between work and masters classes, I can manage about two hours of quality study time on the weekdays and 3-4 on Saturday and Sunday. I’m targeting a November exam, but I’m struggling to find out what balance I should be striking. TIL now I’ve been spending 90% of my time on LR. I’m not even sure how to really drill or prep for RC best.
Any and all advice is welcome. Love yall!
I don’t get the correct answer? Isn’t the economist responding to the question or scenario he was posed? Why do other possible reasons for lowering an interest rate matter?
It feels kind of silly to think that for answer choice E, we claim to not know his intention was to benefit his nephew. Isn’t it universally understood giving money is a benefit to someone?
for question 2, answer choice C, wouldn't it, if true, support as a principle what the bus driver is saying? Like in the scenario that the bus driver does cause an accident due to being guilty of a traffic regulation the bus driver should be reprimanded. isn't that the equal opposite (constrapositive) of the bus driver's scenario, proving that the bus driver should not be reprimanded?
I understood C to mean that "Many people moving into Weston failed to notify either the post office or the driver's license bureau that they had moved to the city" it would strengthen the conclusion because we now have even more reason to assume that reported population number would be low. As in, the real count of people moving into Weston is lower than what could/can be reported in the census. Was it silly to interpret it that way? What should I have caught in the stimulus or answer choice that would not led me go down that road of thinking?
Can we get a more in-depth explanation as to why B is wrong? Isn't okay to pick a "should" answer, because the question stem is specifically asking us what Anna's conclusion might be.