I'm still confused about the Naive assumption part? Like is this something we are supposed to come up with and actively look to counteract in the AC's?
@IsabellaP Naive assumptions are not a reliable strategy, i find it better to try and focus on explaining the phenomenon with the ACs and seeing which one explains it the best rather than coming up with an explanation myself and hunting for a similar situation.
@gpigalicious fr...if i got the question right and already know WHY i got it right, isn't it waste of time to watch the vid? or will it somehow subconsciously help like what
@gpigalicious what I did was tried the question myself and if I got it right AND could explain why my answer was right and all others are wrong, move on. if not, watch the video.
@gpigalicious For myself, I watch the videos first to get the thought process behind, and then as we do more problems, I answer the question first, then I go watch the explanation.
if i can narrow down an RRE question to two answer choices, what's a good question/statement/phrase I can think of in the moment to ground me and remind me what i'm really looking for?
I find these questions to be a lot easier and less time consuming if you dont come up with your own assumptions because that will just confuse you more. I just skim through the answer choices quickly, choose one I think would answer the question of "why could this be?", and then use process of elimination on the rest of them to confirm my answer choice.
@TylerMadani021 I try to do it myself first and then watch the video if I'm unsure at all. If I was hesitant between answers/confused about wording, I watch the vid. But if I have no doubt at all, I just look at the lightbulb explanations quickly
The population for a given single coral reef should still include some, who are have not left for breeding (Original), relying on POE, is the best way forward
Constructive criticism, giving all the answer options at once allows the reader the opportunity to decide which one they believe is correct rather than J.Y. going through answer options individually, its more efficient to let the reader guess and then see why their answer was supported or why it wasnt
B is also wrong because even if it was focusing on the correct phenomenon (the genetic differences between the different reef populations), it does nothing to explain or resolve this apparent contradiction, it just restates the fact that there is a difference
@dreph25 B also only says there is some unspecified amount of genetic difference when the stimulus says, "substantial genetic differences." Something small, but important to note.
C is obviously the more correct one, but it's funny - law of small numbers would say it's more likely that there would be substantial variation as a matter of randomness (noise) that mellows out with larger numbers. Causal explanation is key
89 comments
This was challenging. I have met a match here.
I'm still confused about the Naive assumption part? Like is this something we are supposed to come up with and actively look to counteract in the AC's?
@IsabellaP Naive assumptions are not a reliable strategy, i find it better to try and focus on explaining the phenomenon with the ACs and seeing which one explains it the best rather than coming up with an explanation myself and hunting for a similar situation.
do i really need to watch all of these videos going over the questions or is it better to just do it myself and focus on the questions
@gpigalicious thats what i wonder
@gpigalicious fr...if i got the question right and already know WHY i got it right, isn't it waste of time to watch the vid? or will it somehow subconsciously help like what
@gpigalicious what I did was tried the question myself and if I got it right AND could explain why my answer was right and all others are wrong, move on. if not, watch the video.
@gpigalicious agreed lol it genuinely feels like a waste of time
@gpigalicious For myself, I watch the videos first to get the thought process behind, and then as we do more problems, I answer the question first, then I go watch the explanation.
if i can narrow down an RRE question to two answer choices, what's a good question/statement/phrase I can think of in the moment to ground me and remind me what i'm really looking for?
I find these questions to be a lot easier and less time consuming if you dont come up with your own assumptions because that will just confuse you more. I just skim through the answer choices quickly, choose one I think would answer the question of "why could this be?", and then use process of elimination on the rest of them to confirm my answer choice.
@jamandaa fs. POE seems much more efficient than hunting for these questions
i hate this shit.
@epayne17 im right there with you.
You have some broken html in the <li> tag
Quick question, when you guys get these correct, do you always watch the video after?
@TylerMadani021 I try to do it myself first and then watch the video if I'm unsure at all. If I was hesitant between answers/confused about wording, I watch the vid. But if I have no doubt at all, I just look at the lightbulb explanations quickly
@TylerMadani021 I got this far and never even realized we could be doing these questions. thank you!
why give the suggestion of coming up with your own hypothesis if it generally isn't a good tactic
@arieatsoranges I agree.. JY should remove that advice from the earlier video.
@arieatsoranges i use it as a baseline loosely so i can see if anything pops up with it in the ACs and do POE
The population for a given single coral reef should still include some, who are have not left for breeding (Original), relying on POE, is the best way forward
this is the assumption I made before seeing the answer choices, lets gooooo!!!
hardest question by far
So in most cases is there always going to be a Answer choice B that nearly says what the main idea is almost* in many of these types of questions?
Imagine if all Americans went back to their family's ancestral land to find a partner? Would be wild
@TheSovereign god I don't wanna breed with a fr*nch person :(
Am I the only one who is viewing this explanation like O_o?
@Jaime.vel878 Yeah, some of these explanations are unnecessarily long and add to my confusion
Pack your bags boys, it's breeding season. We're going home for a family reunion!
Eugenic Shrimp > Inbred Shrimp
Constructive criticism, giving all the answer options at once allows the reader the opportunity to decide which one they believe is correct rather than J.Y. going through answer options individually, its more efficient to let the reader guess and then see why their answer was supported or why it wasnt
@Alexaagg3 Below the lesson title is a "show question" button that allows you to see the whole question before watching the video! Hope this helps
@ZoeBradley-Hart thank u sm !
So shrimp are xenophobic and will only breed with their cousin #habsshrimp
@Tobykenobi Sweet Shrimp Alabama
B is also wrong because even if it was focusing on the correct phenomenon (the genetic differences between the different reef populations), it does nothing to explain or resolve this apparent contradiction, it just restates the fact that there is a difference
@dreph25 B also only says there is some unspecified amount of genetic difference when the stimulus says, "substantial genetic differences." Something small, but important to note.
sweeeeet home alabama
@mason! "Why go down the street when you can go down the hall?" -inbred shrimp
@mason! Greenbow, Alabama's finest shrimp, from the local idiot billionaire Forrest Gump
being interrupted with thoughts about shrimp sex while trying to focus on the question is diabolical. it's all diabolical.
GIRL lmao
I genuinely look forward to your comments under here lmfaoooo
I get shy
LMAOOOOOOOO
ACCURATE. 👀
C is obviously the more correct one, but it's funny - law of small numbers would say it's more likely that there would be substantial variation as a matter of randomness (noise) that mellows out with larger numbers. Causal explanation is key
"Correct Answer Choice (C) Before breeding, shrimp of the species examined migrate back to the coral reef at which they were hatched.
Now that’s what I’m fucking talking about."
These are some cousin Fking Shrimp. Must be from Alabama