- Joined
- Nov 2025
- Subscription
- Live
Admissions profile
Discussions
@Janesri hi! I will try my best. I also chose C and after reading it over, I think I understand why. The main point is the 'only if'. So we can already see that the principle thinks it's unhealthy if it does detract from their social development
hurts development-> NOT HEALTHY
But application is saying because Megan reads and it is intellectual, then it is not healthy. So the chain is
reading (stim intell) - > NOT HEALTHY
But does reading (stim intell) = detracting from social development? We don't know and we can't make that jump. So that's why D is the correct answer. The 'only if' is a conditional that we can negate and make it so it's also saying unhealthy. I hope that helps a little bit! God speed on your studying (:
@Jasmin13 hi! I don't think this is the best way but what helps me is looking for the conclusion and once I have that, I find the main topic of the conclusion which is medical conditions. I then look through the answer's and can take out D automatically which leaves me with 4 more choices. Then I read carefully through each choices and see if there are any words that don't make sense. Like for C, we are looking for people who DO more harm, but answer C is talking about not being harmful. We don't know what happens if it is not harmful because the argument only says it IS harmful, so C is out. That leaves us with A, B, and E. From there you can read through again, start negating the answers, if you negate and answer and you're like wait, I need this in the argument, then you have your answer. I know this is a long process and maybe it's not the best way, but it helps me a lot! God speed on your studies (:
@madelinerose94534 I will usually skip the choices that I know for sure are wrong and I will watch the answer choices for the ones I didn't cross out at first glance
@Gracetorres151 you're doing great! you're still showing up for yourself and practicing, it will just take time.
@KeziaH19 I'm also lost... I got it right via the answer button, but in the video explanation, I was wrong?
@MRJones me too... but, I think the drills will help us and we will go through reading questions efficiently :) god speed!
hello law lovers! My name is Hannah and I am 24years old- living in Chicago. I majored in finance and have recently found a passion for law. I’m planning to take the exam April ‘26 and would love to have accountability buddies! God speed to you all on your testing journeys!!!
@MikalahHodge I can try to explain my thought process. I picked B instead of E and now I see why I was wrong. If we continue reading past the external consideration part, it says her response is "such considerations (referring to the external considerations) may be viewed as part of, not separate". Which goes perfect with answer E. I think I chose B because I was wrapped up in the game analogy where she talks about endorsing the rules of the game. I hope that helps a little bit!