D got me because of the causal language, "will result in"

NA is terrible

Question:

The negation of "If A goes up then B" is "/B -> /A" can that be translated as if not B then A goes down?

In the example, I am trying to distinguish between not comfortable vs uncomfortable. Negation of comfortable in the example is uncomfortable but technically wouldn't the negation just be "not comfortable." Does "uncomfortable" really equate to "not comfortable." To me, something can be not comfortable but not it's not necessarily uncomfortable.

Let me know your guys thoughts.

You can do ←s→.

And ‑m→/

Main things to understand:

That the floor of the statements is at least one and and the ceiling is half, the some relationship is bidirectional and the most relationship is unidirectional

You are correct - I think that's why it's saying the "only belong to group 1" It is referring to a group 1 indicator. Thanks!

Any feedback?

I too would like to know.