We can only draw a valid conclusion from "all and most" or "all and some"?

Q4. I assumed that some pilots enjoy flying....

Could Q3 not also be, "It is not the case that most types of pasta are made from wheat" ?

Okay, basically Yoda's training is necessary and guarantees that Luke will become a Jedi ?

@Super_Cookie same

#4

I got confused because I misunderstood the placement of “only.” It’s “ONLY plumbers can fly while…” not “Plumbers can ONLY fly while…” OMGGGG

@ryokace In order for the plaintiff to qualify for suspect class they need an immutable trait. Homosexuality is not an immutable trait, therefore they do not qualify.

SC -> I (suspect class equals immutable trait)

h/I (homosexuality is not immutable)

--------------------------------------

h/SC (homosexuality is not suspect class)

So cold would just be one type of negation, because it's included in not hot?

So.... If the claim gives no support it has to be the conclusion?