Sort of seems like Kevin's reasoning for why A is false is the correct answer. "Doesn't mean each individual person needs to buy the products" but then the correct answer is that EVERYone ought to take those actions?

So Gauthier's reasoning for C being incorrect is that the author doesn't suggest that either is "intuitively true", only that one is simpler. However, the author also doesn't suggest that other things are equal, only that "observational evidence was equally consistent". I find this analysis inconsistent.

@JackHarm3 Ah, I shouldn't have commented this before listening to the rest of Kev's explanation

For question three, the truth of B implies the truth of E. If most charities have increased donations by making donors feel greater emotional connection, then emotional connection must potentially affect the amount of money a charity can raise. So E is necessary for B to be true. Is this a valid reason to choose E over B?

@RyanAlexander That's essentially the same thing. If most charities that have increased the amount of money they raised have NOT done so by making potential donors feel a greater emotional connection, then less than half (not most) HAVE done so by making potential donors feel a greater emotional connection.

The "inheritance" question prevented me from a 1T perfect score. Makes sense that "inheritance" refers to a certain passed-down practice and not the results of said practice, though. 7683.