User Avatar
JeffreyRamirez
Joined
Mar 2026
Subscription
Live

Admissions profile

LSAT
151
CAS GPA
3.19
1L START YEAR
2027

Discussions

User Avatar
JeffreyRamirez
4 days ago

@JosephCronin Thank you for the advice I really appreciate it and it definitely was helpful to see how you worked through it. My brain is wired to ask the why a lot and I guess im a bit confused as to why we would negate /9th lvl -> more to learn to /more to learn -> 9th level? After thats negated I assume we do the contrapositive of G1 which is to flip the two bricks and negate correct? Apologies if its confusing, Im getting lost in the sauce.

1

Hi everyone, I’m working through the Foundations module and I’m hitting a wall with chaining conditionals. I understand how to diagram individual sentences (using the G1, G2, G3 rules), but I’m confused on the "glue" that connects them.

Specifically, I’m struggling with:

  1. How do I know which brick goes "first" in the chain if the stimulus doesn't present them in order?

  2. If I have one brick that is positive (A -> B) and another that is negative (/A -> C), I know I need to flip one to make them match, but I’m struggling to see why or how to pick which one to flip.

For example, with the Wizard/9th-level spell drill, I could diagram the parts, but I couldn't figure out how to bridge the "Not 9th-level" sentence into the main chain.

Does anyone have a specific "checklist" or a different technique they use to decide when to take a contrapositive to force a chain to connect? Below is how I worked through the question if it helps with my question!

Wizards that cast ninth-level spells command a great deal of magical energy. Only wizards who possess extensive training in the arcane can control such magical energy. Spellcasters who can’t cast ninth-level spells still have more to learn.

heres my work: I don’t see an indicator word here, im tempted to put great deal of energy on the left but im gonna take the wizards part to be ALL and use that as a sufficient for G1 SO: FIRST BRICK: W Cast 9 level spells -> great deal of energy

Only is g2 necessary so SECOND BRICK: Can control such energy -> Wizards who posses extensive training in arcane.

It says that if they cant cast ninth level spells so that cant makes it a / so

Conclusion: /Ninth level spells - > Still have more to learn

So all together: W Cast 9 level spells -> great deal of energy, Can control such energy -> Wizards who posses extensive training in arcane. /Ninth level spells - > Still have more to learn

Chained its: W Cast 9 level spells -> great deal of energy -> wizards who possess extensive training -> /still have more to learn.

I know its wrong but im so confused...

2
User Avatar
JeffreyRamirez
4 days ago

@JeffreyRamirez Ive come to figure this out and realize I've been confusing group two and group 1. rewatching the videos and practicing helped a ton!

2
User Avatar
JeffreyRamirez
Edited 5 days ago

@JeffreyRamirez number two i think identifies my issue and im not sure how to resolve it.

If is G1, Unless is G2. Someone carries one ring -> venture into mordor, /Venture into M -> Brave.

now that im here, I do the G3 translation rule right? Venture into M -> /Brave?

then what? how do i chain this? when I chain it, my mind almost wants to do

Venture into M -> Brave -> Someone carries ring. I feel extremely lost hahaa

1
User Avatar
JeffreyRamirez
5 days ago

Is it just me who feels like we made a massive jump from the previous video? Im trying to understand but I dont know what process to follow when I read the stimulus.

for example, for the sith one: I took every to be the conditional for G1, then only if to be G2, so I know every sith lord uses the dark side of the force -> they have strong negative emotion...

okay now that im here contrapositive would be /strong negative emotion -> /uses dark side of the force.

so you want me to then do

SL -> DF -> FL -> SNE wouldnt this then be /SNE /FL -> /SL /DF?

Did i do this right??

1
User Avatar
JeffreyRamirez
6 days ago

Im having the same struggle here as I had with the last one. for question 1 I put capable of feeling pain -> microscopic organism, /microscopic organism -> /capable of feeling pain.

Is my lawgic flawed?? I am genuinely unsure what is making me flip these around...

1
User Avatar
JeffreyRamirez
6 days ago

I've been struggling with the wording after the lawgical part, I think thats whats tripping me up the most.

for example, for 1. I put AS -> Philadelphia, /philadelphia -> /AS.

However the answer is philadelphia -> sunny, /AS/ Philadelphia.

I have 0 idea why this is wrong and also dont get the worded version. Is the contrapositive version If its not always sunny then it is not philadelphia?

any help would be greatly appreciated!!

2

Confirm action

Are you sure?