I see why AC A is right, but I feel like it doesn't COMPLETELY explain the discrepancy, causing people to choose it.

I chose B because I thought that if narrow floorboards weren't significantly cheaper than wide floorboards, that it would prove that the narrow floorboards would be seen as a status symbol.

I came to that conclusion because the stim said that the houses were bigger, so if I looked at it correctly, wealthier people would have to spend more on their floors than people with smaller homes (since, according to AC C, the narrow floorboards were around the same price as the wider floorboards).

Would that be bad reasoning on my end? I still got the question right but i'm curious.

I see why AC C is right, but I don't understand how AC D is wrong; the very first sentence talks about how most chorale preludes were written for the organ. Wouldn't that mean that most of Bach's chorale preludes were written for the organ?

Dang it. The stim confused me so much that I didn't think that the light would still be able to be seen w/o the existence of the quasar.

With the way the stim was worded, I thought the quasar would still have to exist for the light to be seen, so I was thinking that the quasar still existed somehow, causing me to cross out AC E.

I'm having this problem where I'm misinterpreting the stim; does anyone have any tips to mitigate this?

#help

B looked promising to me, however, when I read the stimulus, it said that the difference between guinea pigs and pice are the SAME as those between mice and non-rodent species, unless I interpreted that wrong. AC B implies that the species without a common ancestors may be MORE similar genetically rather than species with a common ancestor. I disregarded B because it didn't match what the stimulus was saying.

Can someone explain how B is wrong?

@thamaraabdelmalek816 6 years later and it's safe to say that you're not alone haha

If B didn't compare itself with the "price increases for some other reason," and just stated "consumers are more likely to continue buying a product if its price increases due to higher taxes," couldn't it technically be correct?

@JesseSides agreed.

For question 5, I got the answer, but not in the way the video describes. I did this:

AO AO AO AO AO

PC PC PC

LH LH

(AO = Attacking owners, PC = Pet Cats, LH = Loving Home)

By doing this I concluded that some pets who live in loving homes fantasize about attacking their owners. Could anyone confirm if this method is also correct?

#Help

Why couldn't the conclusion be "Most B's are C's?"

I'm trying to visualize it with the buckets.

I have a question: couldn't D technically be the right answer if we just negated the other part of the sentence? It would turn into: people who understand musical roots --> good show. Wouldn't that fall in line with what we diagrammed and thus be the right answer?

What makes the tiger argument not as strong as the Disney argument