- Joined
- Jul 2025
- Subscription
- Core
@thamaraabdelmalek816 6 years later and it's safe to say that you're not alone haha
If B didn't compare itself with the "price increases for some other reason," and just stated "consumers are more likely to continue buying a product if its price increases due to higher taxes," couldn't it technically be correct?
For question 5, I got the answer, but not in the way the video describes. I did this:
AO AO AO AO AO
PC PC PC
LH LH
(AO = Attacking owners, PC = Pet Cats, LH = Loving Home)
By doing this I concluded that some pets who live in loving homes fantasize about attacking their owners. Could anyone confirm if this method is also correct?
#Help
Why couldn't the conclusion be "Most B's are C's?"
I'm trying to visualize it with the buckets.
I have a question: couldn't D technically be the right answer if we just negated the other part of the sentence? It would turn into: people who understand musical roots --> good show. Wouldn't that fall in line with what we diagrammed and thus be the right answer?
What makes the tiger argument not as strong as the Disney argument
Can someone explain how B is wrong?