This is a great way to visualize it. The only reason I got this right is because in the content leading up to this it was explained that what differentiates SA from MBT is that we aren't looking for the conclusion, we are looking for the missing link that would guarantee that the conclusion (in this case 'Ms. sandstrom should pay') is a MBT conclusion. The key factor for me is that in these question types we're looking for the missing premise.

@puddingeveryday I eliminated C as an option, but for a different reason. I thought that equating receiving awards for superior designs was assuming too much. There could be various reasons that they received awards while Baxe didn't. The awards could require you to apply for consideration and Baxe didn't do so, or the awards were specific to smaller companies, etc. etc.

Is this line of thinking incorrect and I just got lucky? Or is this just another angle to approach the questionn?

@CamilleHodgkins Not all birds that 'don't return in spring' fall into the category of birds who migrate south. The word that feels a little strange to me is 'return', because return implies that they at some point left the place they would be 'returning' to. So, it can fall into how you're looking at the groups. The more I think about it, there could also be birds who migrate north, east, west, etc. (does that happen?) and 'return' to the original location in the spring. So those birds would fall into the category of 'birds who return in spring' but they didn't migrate south.