wow was the rat poison comment really necessary. I thought you were a nice person. Now I know you are a person who thinks it's okay to joke about torturing and killing animals and probably also okay to actually torture and kill them. Why introduce this into an LSAT practice? It is a sickening distraction.
Can someone explain to me how the sentence "Many birds that migrate south in the fall do not return in the spring" differs at all from "Of birds that migrate south in the fall, many do not return in the spring"? To me, these appear to be the same, since both seem to imply that, when talking about birds that return in the spring, we are only talking about the birds that migrated south, which would make it a subset instead of an intersection, no? I don't think the "many" refers to the birds that migrate, rather, the birds that return.
Does anyone know what the meaning of Indicator in "indicator or qualifier" here means? I know the definition of qualifier here is "A quantifier is a word that usually goes before a noun to express the quantity of the object; for example, a little milk." but what would be the meaning of indicator here? I dont believe its referring to it as an indicator word.
Starting the video talking and howing superset and subset circles made me think throughout the video that all small circles were the subsets and all large circles were the supersets.
In the third example, is it a reasonable assumption to say that the groups could be Students in Mrs. Stoops's class and (Students in Mrs. Stoops's class) who can read rather than Students in Mrs. Stoops's class and (People who) can read?
Many birds that migrate south in the fall do not return in the spring.
In this case why wouldn't birds that "do not return in the spring" just be a subset of "birds that migrate south in the fall"? Since, you can not return some place you weren't before.
I understand the expression "many" is a signifier, but does adding the word return cancel it out or does the word return not matter if there is the signifier?
Is this the only section under "Intersecting Sects"? The scheduling tool says this is supposed to take 2 hours, but this lesson says its section 0 of 0 and the entire concept will take 1m....
The inconsistencies between the study scheduler and the syllabus are confusing...
Is this necessary for Logic reasoning? Im a visual learner (hence why I opted for 7sage instead of LSAT demon) and reading all these for nothing, can someone tell me to what extend this lesson is relevant towards LR and RC?
Just a note as someone on review, I don't think those charts represent these relationships all that well. Just because most jedi are very powerful doesn't mean most powerful things are jedi- keep in mind if you're new that the circle for powerful things could be fully consumer or ten times as big in these intersections. These groups intersect but doesn't mean they have to be equally overlapping.
9
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
34 comments
I assume that the concept sufficient and necessary is irrelevant for now?
I’m sorry but I just spent the last 2 minutes laughing at the rat poison comment. Thank you so much for bringing humor to this journey!
On the LSAT, we will often encounter the following expressions of the intersection relationship: "few," "several," "many," "some," "most," etc.
What are all the inferences about B and C that you can make from
All As are B
All As are C
wow was the rat poison comment really necessary. I thought you were a nice person. Now I know you are a person who thinks it's okay to joke about torturing and killing animals and probably also okay to actually torture and kill them. Why introduce this into an LSAT practice? It is a sickening distraction.
isn't most a way of saying the majority? so shouldn't we automatically know at least half of the jedi set intersects with the powerful set?
Can someone explain to me how the sentence "Many birds that migrate south in the fall do not return in the spring" differs at all from "Of birds that migrate south in the fall, many do not return in the spring"? To me, these appear to be the same, since both seem to imply that, when talking about birds that return in the spring, we are only talking about the birds that migrated south, which would make it a subset instead of an intersection, no? I don't think the "many" refers to the birds that migrate, rather, the birds that return.
Does anyone know what the meaning of Indicator in "indicator or qualifier" here means? I know the definition of qualifier here is "A quantifier is a word that usually goes before a noun to express the quantity of the object; for example, a little milk." but what would be the meaning of indicator here? I dont believe its referring to it as an indicator word.
#help
Starting the video talking and howing superset and subset circles made me think throughout the video that all small circles were the subsets and all large circles were the supersets.
but I think I'm wrong, right?
For 3 shouldnt is be at least 2? cause its some students not, like at least one student here, or am i nit picking
In the third example, is it a reasonable assumption to say that the groups could be Students in Mrs. Stoops's class and (Students in Mrs. Stoops's class) who can read rather than Students in Mrs. Stoops's class and (People who) can read?
With the second example sentence,
Many birds that migrate south in the fall do not return in the spring.
In this case why wouldn't birds that "do not return in the spring" just be a subset of "birds that migrate south in the fall"? Since, you can not return some place you weren't before.
I understand the expression "many" is a signifier, but does adding the word return cancel it out or does the word return not matter if there is the signifier?
The video was great and made it easy to understand! Keep em coming and keep up the good work, JY and all the folks at 7Sage!
#help
Is this the only section under "Intersecting Sects"? The scheduling tool says this is supposed to take 2 hours, but this lesson says its section 0 of 0 and the entire concept will take 1m....
The inconsistencies between the study scheduler and the syllabus are confusing...
Is this necessary for Logic reasoning? Im a visual learner (hence why I opted for 7sage instead of LSAT demon) and reading all these for nothing, can someone tell me to what extend this lesson is relevant towards LR and RC?
Relationships can be hard
Just a note as someone on review, I don't think those charts represent these relationships all that well. Just because most jedi are very powerful doesn't mean most powerful things are jedi- keep in mind if you're new that the circle for powerful things could be fully consumer or ten times as big in these intersections. These groups intersect but doesn't mean they have to be equally overlapping.