User Avatar
Jude Bianouni
Joined
May 2025
Subscription
Live
User Avatar
Jude Bianouni
Thursday, Sep 04 2025

Good luck today!

1
User Avatar
Jude Bianouni
Sunday, Aug 24 2025

why do we have 11 questions in one passage :/

(is this representative of the actual lsat?)

2
User Avatar
Jude Bianouni
Thursday, Aug 21 2025

heyyyyy, slippin jimmy! That's me

1
User Avatar
Jude Bianouni
Friday, Aug 01 2025

I'm interested! I live in NC but I'd be more then happy to attend some Zoom meetings :)

0
User Avatar
Jude Bianouni
Friday, Aug 01 2025

Does anyone wanna make a groupme or something?

3
User Avatar
Jude Bianouni
Monday, Jul 14 2025

@a.ugonna Sorry I'm late, but here's what I think about it. I think that for those statements to be considered an argument, the only way for me to see that would be with "It really shouldn’t have caused a long estrangement." as the conclusion. I think that some of the sentences were unnecessary, though, and none really served as premises. There was a potential conclusion, but the lack of premises gave the conclusion no merit and therefore made the set of statements just that: a set of statements. The argument in question, with you seeing the conclusion as "Therefore, I hugged you because I miss you." makes sense, but it's implied that the incident with the toothpaste flecks on the mirror is not a reasonable means for a breakup or seperation, and I think that this statement overshadows the grounds for any other potential argument.

0

Confirm action

Are you sure?