I'm a bit confused, I learned in my science classes that an experiment to determine a causal relationship would also mean a relationship is valid. ie, if a study (under proper scrutiny) found a causal relationship that studying for the LSAT CAUSES a 10% increase in scores, then it is a valid conclusion that if study then increase in score. Am I misunderstanding or is LSAT causal different from scientific causal?
I'm a bit confused, I learned in my science classes that an experiment to determine a causal relationship would also mean a relationship is valid. ie, if a study (under proper scrutiny) found a causal relationship that studying for the LSAT CAUSES a 10% increase in scores, then it is a valid conclusion that if study then increase in score. Am I misunderstanding or is LSAT causal different from scientific causal?