Went 2:30 minutes over for overanalyzing the stimulus but got the answer right when I finally gave up and did POE

Okay so in the version he gives for B to be true, what happens if we have both answers A and B to choose from. Which one takes precedent? Both are true at the same time. I might be overthinking it and the LSAT never does that though, do let me know if that is the case lol

AP can go die in a ditch

@joszam006 My issue is with timing and getting stuck on questions. Parsing skills would definitely help with that.

Fell for the trap and got it right on BR. E sounded so irrelevant on first viewing. Gotta watch out for that in the future.

@GDatria715 Which one of the answers are you saying this about? The negation of A is not at all destructive to the argument because of the question of ambiguity and and the negation of C also doesn't cause issues for the argument. The fact that most of the films haven't been transferred is not necessary. We only need some of them to not have been transferred as a necessary condition, that is all.

I am curious to see how you negated them, maybe I am in the wrong.

For people that have taken the LSAT before, would this be a question you would think of skipping because of the long stimulus and answers?

In Q4, I fail to understand why the negation cannot be that Some small animals cannot move more rapidly than large animals. This captures the full range required for the negation. Can someone help me understand why that is not a valid negation?

For question 7, I eliminated option 1 by focusing on the word simultaneous. It is emphasizing the simultaneous status of a celestial body, but the stimulus emphasizes Pluto changing its orbit through time. We are not viewing the problem through the lense of simultaneousness.

Just wanted to share the way I looked at it. 🤘🏻

Up to now I though that question stems would consist of verbatim quotes from the stimulus and this through me off! Not a mistake I will be making any longer.