negate test. negate test. negate test

If less water means less predatory insects, wouldn't that also mean less larvae? for C to resolve the discrepancy, there would have to be a reason that drought causes the predatory insect population to decrease but not the larvae population.

I missed that "if". oops

@lin.guo0714 it weakens it but doesn't destroy it. even if there is an additional reason why enrollment is low, it could still ALSO be true that increasing tuition would still improve enrollment somewhat.

I’m just taking the L on this one

Correct me if I’m wrong, but I got this answer without mapping simply by excluding any answer choices that beget an unreachable conclusion.

I understand why D is correct and I got it on the BR. But I don’t understand how we can rule out C. I chose C initially because the stim never defines a “social process” and C gives us a definition for that.

Why do i feel like I’m reading a foreign language

@MitulChowdhury No. The only contrapositive that can be taken is:

if it is NOT the case that one should not play a practical joke -> it would not cause harm to the target, and it would not cause that person harm.

As you can see, this is not the same thing as saying that you SHOULD play the joke. And even if it did say that, it is still the succificient condition, not the necessary.