#feedback In the analysis of answer choice A, the author states that A, a wrong answer, could be amended to "It is a premise for the claim that water itself should be considered a polluter" to be correct. This does not seem accurate. For, it is merely an implied conclusion that water ought be considered a polluter. Instead, the stimulus' explicit conclusion is that "water itself is among the biggest polluters." Thus, what is integral to the stimulus' conclusion is an element of relativity that is not found in the author's amended answer choice A.

#feedback 2:43 the blue circle line thingy looks like baymax from big hero six