- Joined
- Jun 2025
- Subscription
- Live
Admissions profile
Discussions
I don't really like D's use of the word "testimony". I was very critical of this. Idk, to me, signing a petition is not a testimony.
As long as it is before December, you should be good; it is considered on time, so there are still tons of scholarship money. While you're not considered super "early," you're definitely not "late"
@new_cheese They also don't make the version of the content for fee waiver recipients any lower in quality than the ordinary, quite the contrary if anything. They also did not put any barriers of paperwork/logistical nonsense to keep people from accessing this offer. People recognize authenticity and I swear this gift will not be given in vain.
@Roseba Seriously, I've been studying full-time since March, and I'm still in shock... I don't think any other test prep company does this. The generosity here is actually crazy. I was considering borrowing money to pay for test prep services. When I make it as a lawyer, I vow to pay it forward
Just wanted to say that I'm really grateful to 7sage for giving free access to fee-waiver students. There is no way I would've been able to afford and study the curriculum without 7sage's kindness. You have no idea how much of an impact this makes for us lower-income test takers. I'm forever indebted to 7sage and my GOATS, J.Y. and Kevin 🫶🫶🫶
How many hours in total would you say you studied? Also what was your diagnostic?
I got this question correct but I feel like D has truth to it. Theres clearly a phenomenon. Phoebe proposes that correlation=causation. That is one logical explanation/possibility (not a good one) for the phenomenon.
others can include
a->b
b>a
c->a, c->b
coincidence
these are the explanations given in our curriculum
Quincy abesolutely proposes the "coincidence" possibility. To say he offers an explanation different than phoebe's is descriptively accurate, since coincidence is an explanation.
It seems like all over the internet, there are anecdotes saying it takes about 4-6 months to break 170+. However, this seems strange to me because it is not super accurate.
I have a theory that it takes about 600 good hours of studying on average to break 170+. 600 actual recorded study hours, not including breaks and zoning out.
Thought?
This has gotta be a top 5 question for me all time. I loved how sneakily this one requires you to make an inference from the answer choice interacting with the stim. It's such a funny little inference that makes complete sense and is quite simple, but is sneakily hidden. Loved this question.