Still so confused here #help going through POE I eliminated all and then went w A even though it felt wrong, and it is, BUT I do not understand how less individuals buying cars weakens ?!? For example if 25yo 50% indiv. bought cars and avg price was 100$; now 10% indiv. bought cars and avg is 1,000$ isn't that conclusion still valid!?!? How are we assuming that indiv. are not paying the rough avg !??! is there a singles discount now?!?! Am I missing something here ? #HELP

Looks really Helpful ! would love to see RC 'Fast Track" lessons soon !!

I get that D doesn't help resolve as it just improves the second study but doesn't that do more for the argument than E saying there is another variable between subjects in the first study ? #help

Interested ! Link isn’t working anymore

Interested !!

Hey ! I’m in Malden and work in Charlestown I’d love to connect and study together taking January hope Nov goes well for you !!

My insta is @lauranicolemartone hmu on there ! Xo

Would love to join a study group / chat w you guys taking January as well hoping to get to high 160s testing mid / high 150s now !

#HELP

I do not understand two things

Davis claims "the value of the property stolen; the harm to the victim is directly proportional to the pertinent value" which could be inferred that the longer something is stolen the more harm thus more compensation. based on this inference Davis would also agree with AC D in addition to Higuchi which does not make it a disagreement.

What am I doing wrong?

Higuchi claims "more than one factor MUST be considered" this infers that there are multiple factors to consider which literally means a case by case basis. Thus are not stating a general rule just adding that there is another factor, there could be two or twenty either way you have take each case and measure against the factor. Davis says only one factor which makes AC E a disagreement

What am I doing wrong here?

@THS link did not work for me either 😢

Highly Interested ! add me on IG ill send my number @lauranicolemartone xo

Add me please xo

@pcoady1289 this is exactly what I did, I feel like its still gets the essence of the rule because were just switching the domain and the necessary? would love some more options of this

@osaieh So helpful ! Wouldn't have thought to map it like three separate rules, that makes a lot of sense! Thank you xo

Since there's no more games section is there a way to translate the second sentence into lawgic? Instead of using the game board technique that isn't needed or taught anymore.

@lilakdunn ‼️

#5 literally short circuited my brain comforting to know I'm not alone! inference comparisons really though how can you assume now v accustomed rather than accustomed v not accustomed? or accustomed v outliner ??

Hi ! older career switcher as well as hoping to take NOV ! Would love to study together ! My insta is @lauranicolemartone I can send my email there to avoid spam xo