- Joined
- Jun 2025
- Subscription
- Core
why did kevin draw the first sentence as Complex behaviour <-some>- /conscious and not /conscious --> complex behaviour (group 3 translation) -- what makes it not a conditional
im a little confused about A being correct. i understand the logic behind it. where im stuck is when you draw A out doesn't it bridge the P-->C backwards? considerations (when deciding to move figure) --> archaeological - because of 'the only (being sufficient condition). shouldn't the correct answer be something like: archaeological considerations ---> move mosaics
this question - same with the previous one- if confusing me a little because the answer choice seems to be building the P--> C bridge backwards (unless i'm misinterpreting) answer D says: value of a jewel ---> based on aesthetic pleasure. but the conclusion in the stimulus is about the value so should the answer be aesthetic pleaser --> value
would it be wrong to draw it out in reverse: abstract paint --> non-rep political action -> rep