this question - same with the previous one- if confusing me a little because the answer choice seems to be building the P--> C bridge backwards (unless i'm misinterpreting) answer D says: value of a jewel ---> based on aesthetic pleasure. but the conclusion in the stimulus is about the value so should the answer be aesthetic pleaser --> value
is it really highly encouraged to use lawgic for these types of questions? I don't find it necessary so far, but I don't want it to trip me up in the future and wonder what to get in the habit of
Remember to not follow your biased views!!!! I missed this one because of my own bias on the matter, rather than putting myself in the role of what the question asked.
#help #feedback am I the only one that can't see my time when doing the question anymore? I only see it after I submit my blind review. I used to see it on the old website so idk whats happening
#Feedback. I'm wondering if this is correct thinking: for PSAr questions, the correct answer choice should not add anything extra or new facts, or other considerations. The correct answer choice should just lay out P --> C.
Once again my P→C was "wrong," I missed the importance of aesthetic pleasure and instead had "If c/f diamond looks real, is equal to value as real diamond." once I looked at the ACs, D immediately jumped out and I realized I had missed the importance of aesthetic pleasure in my P→C. I don't know if this is important but I am really wondering why I keep getting my P→C slightly wrong.
#feedback When I take the drills first and it has a timer, I noticed that it doesn't stop so how is it a timed session? I end up taking so long because I know it won't kick me out. Also, how do you know the target time? I only see it during BR
the idea of narrow tailoring will come up a lot in con law. cant be worrying about what's coming up in law school j.y. im still trying to get thru the lsat
I'm a little confused on this one. I thought D was wrong because it was starting at the conclusion and going to the premises (C → P), which is why I ruled it out. Can anyone help explain where I went wrong? I understand why the other answer choices are wrong, I'm just not quite grasping why D is right.
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
47 comments
this question - same with the previous one- if confusing me a little because the answer choice seems to be building the P--> C bridge backwards (unless i'm misinterpreting) answer D says: value of a jewel ---> based on aesthetic pleasure. but the conclusion in the stimulus is about the value so should the answer be aesthetic pleaser --> value
is it really highly encouraged to use lawgic for these types of questions? I don't find it necessary so far, but I don't want it to trip me up in the future and wonder what to get in the habit of
REMEMBER: PSA correct answers generally have strong logical force to have sufficient support
Remember to not follow your biased views!!!! I missed this one because of my own bias on the matter, rather than putting myself in the role of what the question asked.
Got it right. But this does not feel like a lv. 1 question.
#help #feedback am I the only one that can't see my time when doing the question anymore? I only see it after I submit my blind review. I used to see it on the old website so idk whats happening
#Feedback. I'm wondering if this is correct thinking: for PSAr questions, the correct answer choice should not add anything extra or new facts, or other considerations. The correct answer choice should just lay out P --> C.
Garbonzo beans of a section smh
this has been the easiest section for me so far ... am i cooked chat?
Got it correct! Yessir
blind review ftw
Once again my P→C was "wrong," I missed the importance of aesthetic pleasure and instead had "If c/f diamond looks real, is equal to value as real diamond." once I looked at the ACs, D immediately jumped out and I realized I had missed the importance of aesthetic pleasure in my P→C. I don't know if this is important but I am really wondering why I keep getting my P→C slightly wrong.
#feedback When I take the drills first and it has a timer, I noticed that it doesn't stop so how is it a timed session? I end up taking so long because I know it won't kick me out. Also, how do you know the target time? I only see it during BR
LOL. Answer choice E actually made me laugh so hard. It's wacky as hell
I keep getting the answers wrong but in BR right because of time!
So, I read the question and looked at the answer choice, I knew for sure what I was looking for but I did not solve this using a rule.
can we use the negate test to see if it weakens argument on this type of question?
Oooooooooookay
Finally got one of these rule apps right. It took me 4:14 to finish only for me to find out it was labeled easiest.
this was dumb easy or was that just me?
do you guys watch the videos if you get the question right still
the idea of narrow tailoring will come up a lot in con law. cant be worrying about what's coming up in law school j.y. im still trying to get thru the lsat
#feedback
This one doesn't have the question written before explaining why that choice is incorrect, which helps me. Ya'll should add it in, please.
I'm a little confused on this one. I thought D was wrong because it was starting at the conclusion and going to the premises (C → P), which is why I ruled it out. Can anyone help explain where I went wrong? I understand why the other answer choices are wrong, I'm just not quite grasping why D is right.
are negative rules usually wrong answers?