- Joined
- Sep 2025
- Subscription
- Live
STOP CHANGING YOUR ANSWER you are ALWAYS right the 1st time!!!!!!!!! ughhhh
Greetings! My name is Lex, I'm a non-trad from the Silicon Valley and planning to take the November LSAT for the first time. I lost my decade long cybersecurity job 2 years ago while in a coma, following a fire that left me disabled (and nearly un-alived).
After wasting the last year applying to literally thousands of jobs, having countless dead end interviews, and otherwise doing everything to find a new job - I realized my skills are quickly becoming obsolete and need to go back to school one way or another.
I've always dreamt of being a lawyer and making a positive difference in the lives of others. So here I am, turning 35 next month, and shooting for a 170+ for a chance to attend USF, USC, Stanford, UCLA, USD, Hastings, SCU, Davis, Berkeley, Pepperdine or Irvine. UGPA is 3.1 so I know its quite the ambitious goal, but hey "you miss 100% of the shots you never take"!
Greetings! My name is Lex, I'm a non-trad from the Silicon Valley and planning to take the November LSAT for the first time. I lost my decade long cybersecurity job 2 years ago while in a coma, following a fire that left me disabled (and nearly un-alived).
After wasting the last year applying to literally thousands of jobs, having countless dead end interviews, and otherwise doing everything to find a new job - I realized my skills are quickly becoming obsolete and need to go back to school one way or another.
I've always dreamt of being a lawyer and making a positive difference in the lives of others. So here I am, turning 35 next month, and shooting for a 170+ for a chance to attend USF, USC, Stanford, UCLA, USD, Hastings, SCU, Davis, Berkeley, Pepperdine or Irvine. UGPA is 3.1 so I know its quite the ambitious goal, but hey "you miss 100% of the shots you never take"!
i need to learn to trust my gut because initially i was correct - most of the time when i'm not 100% sure and I change my answer, it turns out that I was right originally 😤
the only reason i got this right was because i predicted the answer. B and D also sounded correct and I was torn between the answers before I just decided to go with the one I predicted. I'm learning to trust my gut cuz every time (most of the time) I change my answer I was right originally.
I was glad to get this right, because I really made my best effort to break it down/translate it. Also, predicting the answer before reading the choices really helps a lot with NA questions. I have been out of school for 10+ years, and only recently began studying for the LSAT like a month ago (which I am doing full time pretty much) but am noticing lots of improvement since I started doing this (with tons of practice) - Hope this helps someone!
📌 Conclusion: The meaning of a poem is NOT just whatever the author wants it to be.
ℹ️ Premise: Sometimes readers of a poem find it meaningful in ways the author did not intend/expect.
⚠️ Assumes that:
🔎 readers can interpret a work of poetry to mean something beyond what the author meant for it. That's what makes it art/"beauty is in the eye of the beholder".
➖ Negated AC:
a) Different readers will NOT usually disagree about what the author of a particular poem intends to communicate by means of that poem.
(Readers usually agree on the meaning of a poem.) ❌
b) If someone writes a great poem, they DON'T intend the poem to express one primary idea.
(Authors of great poems don't intend for them to have one particular meaning.) ❌
c) Readers WILL agree about the meaning of a poem if they DO agree about what the author of the poem intended the poem to mean.
(If readers agree on why they think a poem was written, they will agree on its meaning.) ❌
d) NO one reading a great poem can discern every idea that the author intended to express in the poem.
(No one can discern the intended meaning of a poem.) ❌
e) If a reader believes that a poem expresses a particular idea, then that idea is NOT part of the meaning of the poem.
(Poems don't mean whatever you think they mean) ✅
ℹ️ This is the NA: it's saying that the meaning of a poem is whatever you get out of it. This closely resembles the assumption I predicted above. The nature of poetry is such that it is not meant to be taken literally, and therefore open to interpretation