User Avatar
LexMilana
Joined
Sep 2025
Subscription
Live
PrepTests ·
PT129.S2.Q24
User Avatar
LexMilana
Wednesday, Oct 08 2025

I was glad to get this right, because I really made my best effort to break it down/translate it. Also, predicting the answer before reading the choices really helps a lot with NA questions. I have been out of school for 10+ years, and only recently began studying for the LSAT like a month ago (which I am doing full time pretty much) but am noticing lots of improvement since I started doing this (with tons of practice) - Hope this helps someone!

📌 Conclusion: The meaning of a poem is NOT just whatever the author wants it to be.

ℹ️ Premise: Sometimes readers of a poem find it meaningful in ways the author did not intend/expect.

⚠️ Assumes that:

🔎 readers can interpret a work of poetry to mean something beyond what the author meant for it. That's what makes it art/"beauty is in the eye of the beholder".

Negated AC:

a) Different readers will NOT usually disagree about what the author of a particular poem intends to communicate by means of that poem.

(Readers usually agree on the meaning of a poem.) ❌

b) If someone writes a great poem, they DON'T intend the poem to express one primary idea.

(Authors of great poems don't intend for them to have one particular meaning.) ❌

c) Readers WILL agree about the meaning of a poem if they DO agree about what the author of the poem intended the poem to mean.

(If readers agree on why they think a poem was written, they will agree on its meaning.) ❌

d) NO one reading a great poem can discern every idea that the author intended to express in the poem.

(No one can discern the intended meaning of a poem.) ❌

e) If a reader believes that a poem expresses a particular idea, then that idea is NOT part of the meaning of the poem.

(Poems don't mean whatever you think they mean) ✅

ℹ️ This is the NA: it's saying that the meaning of a poem is whatever you get out of it. This closely resembles the assumption I predicted above. The nature of poetry is such that it is not meant to be taken literally, and therefore open to interpretation

1
PrepTests ·
PT132.S4.Q23
User Avatar
LexMilana
Monday, Oct 06 2025

STOP CHANGING YOUR ANSWER you are ALWAYS right the 1st time!!!!!!!!! ughhhh

0
PrepTests ·
PT102.S3.Q9
User Avatar
LexMilana
Sunday, Oct 05 2025

i need to learn to trust my gut because initially i was correct - most of the time when i'm not 100% sure and I change my answer, it turns out that I was right originally 😤

0
PrepTests ·
PT130.S3.Q21
User Avatar
LexMilana
Saturday, Oct 04 2025

the only reason i got this right was because i predicted the answer. B and D also sounded correct and I was torn between the answers before I just decided to go with the one I predicted. I'm learning to trust my gut cuz every time (most of the time) I change my answer I was right originally.

0
User Avatar
LexMilana
Saturday, Sep 06 2025

Greetings! My name is Lex, I'm a non-trad from the Silicon Valley and planning to take the November LSAT for the first time. I lost my decade long cybersecurity job 2 years ago while in a coma, following a fire that left me disabled (and nearly un-alived).

After wasting the last year applying to literally thousands of jobs, having countless dead end interviews, and otherwise doing everything to find a new job - I realized my skills are quickly becoming obsolete and need to go back to school one way or another.

I've always dreamt of being a lawyer and making a positive difference in the lives of others. So here I am, turning 35 next month, and shooting for a 170+ for a chance to attend USF, USC, Stanford, UCLA, USD, Hastings, SCU, Davis, Berkeley, Pepperdine or Irvine. UGPA is 3.1 so I know its quite the ambitious goal, but hey "you miss 100% of the shots you never take"!

11
User Avatar
LexMilana
Edited Saturday, Sep 06 2025

Greetings! My name is Lex, I'm a non-trad from the Silicon Valley and planning to take the November LSAT for the first time. I lost my decade long cybersecurity job 2 years ago while in a coma, following a fire that left me disabled (and nearly un-alived).

After wasting the last year applying to literally thousands of jobs, having countless dead end interviews, and otherwise doing everything to find a new job - I realized my skills are quickly becoming obsolete and need to go back to school one way or another.

I've always dreamt of being a lawyer and making a positive difference in the lives of others. So here I am, turning 35 next month, and shooting for a 170+ for a chance to attend USF, USC, Stanford, UCLA, USD, Hastings, SCU, Davis, Berkeley, Pepperdine or Irvine. UGPA is 3.1 so I know its quite the ambitious goal, but hey "you miss 100% of the shots you never take"!

4
User Avatar
LexMilana
Friday, Sep 05 2025

@KilianDuarteme tooo

diagnostic is 160 

0
User Avatar
LexMilana
Friday, Sep 05 2025

@YadiraMcVey Same, I chose B as well. Also been out of school in the workforce (tech) for 10 years. Wishing you the best my fellow non-trad! God speed

0

Confirm action

Are you sure?