User Avatar
MackenzieGibson
Joined
Sep 2026
Subscription
Live

Admissions profile

LSAT
Not provided Goal score: 170
CAS GPA
3.07
1L START YEAR
2028

Applications

Arizona
Intend to apply
Campbell
Intend to apply
Charleston
Intend to apply
Elon
Intend to apply
FIU
Intend to apply
GSU
Intend to apply
John Marshall
Intend to apply
Loyola - New Orleans
Intend to apply
Maryland
Intend to apply
Mercer
Intend to apply
Miami
Intend to apply
Nova Southeastern
Intend to apply
Richmond
Intend to apply
South Carolina
Intend to apply
South Texas
Intend to apply
Stetson
Intend to apply
Suffolk
Intend to apply
Tennessee
Intend to apply
Texas Southern
Intend to apply
Texas Tech
Intend to apply
U Florida
Intend to apply
UNTD
Intend to apply
UT Austin
Intend to apply

Discussions

User Avatar
MackenzieGibson
Wednesday, Sep 30

wait so for question 2 i know that therefore is a conclusion indicator, but i thought there were two premises "if max were guilty, he would not ask the police to investigate" and "he asked the police to investigate," making the conclusion "he is not guilty." could anyone help

1
User Avatar
MackenzieGibson
Tuesday, Sep 29

I agree! i learned in a symbolic logic class that looking for the conclusion, or what is trying to be proved, is the easiest way to figure out if its an argument and what the premises are

1

Confirm action

Are you sure?