Someone please help me understand for the better. For Question 4, my answer was " Safety of passengers and other people --> must be programmed " with the contrapositive being " /must be programmed --> /safety of passengers or /other people ".

I completely focused on "must" as a necessary indicator and thought that "programmed" was the necessary conclusion.

I initially thought "programmed" should be the sufficient condition, and the rest being the necessary condition but the necessary indicator really threw me off. I didn't know "must" could refer to the whole clause right after it. Am I just dumb??

@JustinBehren 226-504-7278

@Kihla333 I would be happy to join, also planning to take it in April for the first time!

I've been studying since April 2024, and it's been on and off since then due to work and school. I'm undiagnosed but I've convinced myself I probably have adhd lol. I'm locking in for April to do the LSAT and I need someone or preferably a group to hold me accountable, I would love to join if possible!

Is "do" really necessary in this example? The sentence can easily do without that referential word if it was framed as "..fewer allergies than children in small families".

P.S. No pun intended :)

4/5 for all examples, the second question in the previous lesson was the one I got wrong!