I felt so good about necessary vs sufficient until the ninja turtle relationship. For some reason that one keeps throwing me off.
Correct me if I'm wrong:
Subset: Turtles
Superset: Ninjas
Being a turtle is sufficient to be a ninja.
So as a turtle you are necessarily a ninja...
But it is not necessary to be a turtle to be a ninja.
Being a ninja is necessary to be a turtle.
But not all ninjas are turtles.
0
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
I felt so good about necessary vs sufficient until the ninja turtle relationship. For some reason that one keeps throwing me off.
Correct me if I'm wrong:
Subset: Turtles
Superset: Ninjas
Being a turtle is sufficient to be a ninja.
So as a turtle you are necessarily a ninja...
But it is not necessary to be a turtle to be a ninja.
Being a ninja is necessary to be a turtle.
But not all ninjas are turtles.