How do avoid overlooking the second condition usually the SC when (SC and NC embedded condition) embedded conditional?

I'll be revisiting embedded conditional lesson.

/drive-out-poachers → (relocated-panda → /prosper)

For NC conjunctions, both were not required to meet the condition,

as in M-->O, M-->N, or M--> N and O?

This tool is critical, I look forward to the surprise that will happen,

To me, the trash bin, seemed like you could poke holes in the premises, which made the argument weak in comparison to the other two stimuli, the premise were stronger in supporting conclusion in that world.

How you retake the exam in this the Review (PAI) drill? Thaks,

This is freaking amazing oh my goodnes, chile.