I'm so confused. I got 5/5 but it said blind review was recommended for 2 so I changed my answers. Why did it say that if they were right?!!

This one was hard!! I got it wrong and in the BR I almost picked D but I felt like it was wrong because it was saying that the politician was insincere when the stimulus just said their criticism was insincere.

I'm finding it really hard to differentiate between predicate-object and modifier. For example in Q3, I identified that the predicate-verb was 'declared' so asked myself modifier questions like where, when, who etc, which led me to think "billboards are the basis of our business" was a modifier. But it's actually an object?? I just feel like it's so confusing! Anyone got any advice? Many thanks.

I got this question right, but can someone explain to me why the first sentance is a premise instead of context? In the video explanation, I understand that it is being used as evidence to support the sub-conclusion, but I feel like it is tricky because the way I saw it was table-setting context. If someone could break it down further for me that would be great!

I'm an English literature writer. Therefore, I'm one of the best writers in the country.

Necessary Assumption: I know how to use a pen.