- Joined
- Jan 2026
- Subscription
- Live
Admissions profile
Applications
Discussions
@Mound Visualize it on a piece of paper. It doesn't have to mention congestion-- it just needs to be a valid conditional chain/ statement that does not conflate the necessary and sufficient. If you properly visualized it, you would see that COL decreased -> Profit increase. That, even if a mere 'premise', is a valid conditional statement and therefore a MBT conclusion. A valid MBT answer doesn't have to bring all of the information together and touch on every component-- it solely needs to be a valid conditional statement that, once again, does not conflate the N and S. Every other answer choice, of you were to go by process of elimination, conflated the two; 'if' will always introduce the S, and none of the subjects following 'if' in the answer choices were sufficientconditions/ shared a sufficient influence over the subject in the 'necessary' position.
@AnaColuma During the exam, you will come across a lot of complex biconditionals/ embedded conditionals. esp with a time crunch, it all comes down to understanding which side of the arrow clauses actually go on, and how each conditional relates to one another! Trust. It also facilitates intuitive understanding, translating complex ideas into simpler logic/ finding their logical equivalence with ease
@BenBeecham Slow is smooth, smooth is fast. Let go of any ego and slow down! BR is worthless if you rely on it to properly be accurate:)