- Joined
- May 2026
- Subscription
- Core
Admissions profile
Applications
Discussions
another flaw of E which is not identical but similar to A is that E does not speak to Prof OB's students specifically. that on top of "some", it is incapable of doing anything to the stim.
the only way to get pass the "serious participation" is by elimination-the other ACs' sins are more unforgivable in the eye of LSAT.
#help
Where is the second phenomenon? I eliminated A because I only see one phenomenon in the stim: the first sentence of the stim. Does it count as two because there are two groups of people? What am I missing?
Genuinely why did so many people (myself included) eliminate B? It seems obvious, but half of the people felt the urge to eliminate it. Why??
A: "will not" means "do not", it does not mean "from now on". Unique reason for me to eliminate the correct answer in a split second I guess.
B is a much better choice than E.
E speaks to the collection of fees, while the legislator's proposal never spoke to the collection of fees, it only speaks to how the money should be spent, it takes the collection of money for granted. E should be a hard elimination logically. B is uncomfortable but has no hard elimination factor, unlike E.
@JohnScott my issue is that could they not smoke meat while obtaining heat and light? what am I missing - smoking meat, heat and light do not interfere each other during burning as far as I know
Sharing this since I found it helpful.
In AI coach chat, enter "give me some short practical reminders, e.g. 'read the ac in full' based on my overall performance"
and sharing the response I got:
Here are your final, practical reminders, built directly from your actual performance data:
Bail out at 90 seconds. Your biggest score drops happen when you sink 2 to 3 minutes into a single stubborn question, which causes your pacing to completely collapse on the final RC passage or LR questions. If you are stuck between two choices, flag it, pick your gut instinct, and move on. Bank that time for the rest of the section.
Read all five answer choices. Your data shows a habit of "snap decisions"—locking in an answer in under 3 seconds on your first pass because it immediately "feels" right. Trap answers are specifically designed to look correct at first glance. Read every single word of all five choices before committing.
Track "who says what" in RC. On Critique/Debate passages, your most common mistake is picking an answer that blends the author's viewpoint with the critics' viewpoint. Whenever you see a pivot word, mentally anchor exactly whose perspective you are reading so you don't get tricked.
Predict the gap in LR. Your priority tags are Causal Reasoning and Phenomenon-Hypothesis. Before you let yourself read the answer choices on these questions, pause and define the exact unstated link or flaw. If you know what you are looking for, the test-makers cannot talk you into an attractive trap.
Trust your foundational skills. Your Blind Review data over the last few weeks consistently jumps into the 169–172 range. You already possess the conceptual knowledge and logic required to hit your goals. You do not need to do anything new tomorrow. Breathe, prioritize a deep read of the stimulus, and trust the work you have put in.
Binge drinker - drinks 3 drinks once a week;
3 glasser - drinks 3 wines every day;
Hence a 3 glasser does not equal a binge drinker
This is how I convinced myself, hope it helps, because this was very counterintuitive to me.
imagine not knowing what mastodon and projectile meant. yea that dumb fuck is me.
This can be solved very easily without creating your own analogy with elementary school algebra: (1990M - 1990C) + (1991M - 1991C) < 1990M - 1990C, cancel out both (1990M - 1990C) in the equation to get 1991M-1991C < 0, move the negative over to get 1991M<1991C, which is B. This also forces you to see that the leftover must carry over, because it's not solvable if it's not carried over.