I follow the logical reasoning in each chain. However, in this set of questions, it doesn't seem entirely fair to make a distinction in question four about being expected to make those decisions and actually being able to make those decisions, when there is basically the same distinction not being made in question two regarding Pokemon evolving and being capable of evolving. It just seems a bit inconsistent, but maybe I am just overlooking certain nuances in each question that makes the difference distinguishable.
1
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
I follow the logical reasoning in each chain. However, in this set of questions, it doesn't seem entirely fair to make a distinction in question four about being expected to make those decisions and actually being able to make those decisions, when there is basically the same distinction not being made in question two regarding Pokemon evolving and being capable of evolving. It just seems a bit inconsistent, but maybe I am just overlooking certain nuances in each question that makes the difference distinguishable.