The Disney argument is the strongest because the premises provide only two options for the fast pass. Another claim states that Walt has not completed one of those options, therefore, he must have completed the other option to obtain his fast pass. The passage does not provide any other option to obtain a fast pass, so the conclusion is fully supported.
The Tiger argument is the second strongest because although the premise that tigers are aggressive does support the conclusion that not every mammal is suitable to keep as a pet, the argument still leaves room for questioning. (1) Are ALL tigers aggressive? (2) Does someone want an aggressive pet?
The Big argument is the weakest because although the cat's actions/appearance support the argument that he knocked over the bin and ate the fish, it too leaves room for questioning. (1) What if the cat just ate his dinner? (2) What if the cat was simply cleaning himself (beyond his regular routine of doing so after eating). There could be many other reasons why the cat is doing what he is doing that could not support the fact he ate the leftovers.
2
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
The Disney argument is the strongest because the premises provide only two options for the fast pass. Another claim states that Walt has not completed one of those options, therefore, he must have completed the other option to obtain his fast pass. The passage does not provide any other option to obtain a fast pass, so the conclusion is fully supported.
The Tiger argument is the second strongest because although the premise that tigers are aggressive does support the conclusion that not every mammal is suitable to keep as a pet, the argument still leaves room for questioning. (1) Are ALL tigers aggressive? (2) Does someone want an aggressive pet?
The Big argument is the weakest because although the cat's actions/appearance support the argument that he knocked over the bin and ate the fish, it too leaves room for questioning. (1) What if the cat just ate his dinner? (2) What if the cat was simply cleaning himself (beyond his regular routine of doing so after eating). There could be many other reasons why the cat is doing what he is doing that could not support the fact he ate the leftovers.