User Avatar
PhillBed
Joined
Jul 2026
Subscription
Core

Admissions profile

LSAT
146
CAS GPA
3.56
1L START YEAR
Not provided

Applications

McGill
In process

Discussions

User Avatar
PhillBed
Tuesday, Aug 18

@yoshifo That is not what it is saying. It is saying that we need to find the missing premise of "A -> B" to conclude that "A -> C"

So:

Bananas -> Fruits

WE NEED: Apples -> Bananas

TO CONCLUDE: Apples -> Fruits

This is the main difference they are trying to explain between MBT (Must Be True) questions and SA questions. Where we need to find the "WE NEED" portion in SA.

1

Confirm action

Are you sure?