- Joined
- Jun 2026
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
I'm kind of confused. Why does B -> C and A -> C lead us to A -> B? Isn't that mixing up necessary and sufficient?
For eg:
Bananas -> Fruits
Apples -> Fruits
________________
Apples -> Bananas?
Originally, I thought that even if there was no fishing in Quapaw, it didn't tell us if there was fishing in Highwater so it didnt matter. I was too busy stubbornly looking for differences between the two lakes to realize that no prior fishing made the fishing ban redundant, whether or not other ppl fished in Highwater.
i was so confident that the main conclusion was "An act or omission by one person is not right if such an act or omission done by large numbers of people would be socially damaging." :((
i think my biggest mistake is I stop reading options when I see an option that sounds even remotely right
@2018GT36MT ahhh that makes sense, i was trying too hard to apply logic and got confused </3
i dont really understand how this relates to the previous content we were taught
is it even possible to read any faster without zoning out??