User Avatar
yoshifo
Joined
Jun 2026
Subscription
Core

Admissions profile

LSAT
Not provided Goal score: 175
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
Not provided

Discussions

PrepTests ·
PT144.S2.Q9
User Avatar
yoshifo
Edited 17 hours ago

Originally, I thought that even if there was no fishing in Quapaw, it didn't tell us if there was fishing in Highwater so it didnt matter. I was too busy stubbornly looking for differences between the two lakes to realize that no prior fishing made the fishing ban redundant, whether or not other ppl fished in Highwater.

1
User Avatar
yoshifo
Sunday, Jul 5

first lesson of the day and i think the day is already over...

7
PrepTests ·
PT106.S3.Q14
User Avatar
yoshifo
Thursday, Jul 2

i was so confident that the main conclusion was "An act or omission by one person is not right if such an act or omission done by large numbers of people would be socially damaging." :((

1
User Avatar
yoshifo
Thursday, Jul 2

i think my biggest mistake is I stop reading options when I see an option that sounds even remotely right

9
User Avatar
yoshifo
Wednesday, Jul 1

@2018GT36MT ahhh that makes sense, i was trying too hard to apply logic and got confused </3

3
User Avatar
yoshifo
Sunday, Jun 28

i dont really understand how this relates to the previous content we were taught

3
User Avatar
yoshifo
Edited Saturday, Jun 27

what would the contrapositive of this look like? If CF -> AF or JF, does that mean /AF AND /FJ -> /CF?

1

Confirm action

Are you sure?