10 years later and this is still great!

@7SageTutor This was a very helpful explanation!

@RedFish I feel like I get more anxious from not being productive but I'll try to relax a bit for the next few days.

@David_Busis Personally I would find that process super helpful. I don't want it to mess up what I have done in the past. Which is my issue whenever I went to recalculate the schedule. However I would want it to realistically recalculate based on what I have left.

@Kihla333 Thank you. I would love that for regular studying so I will look into that as well. But I am looking for one that I can use during the exam (only foam).

@fmorea We can have foam earplugs during the exam

@haena Thank you! I will try those out

@Elecoo Yes as long as they are foam!

Vacuous is my new favorite insult.

Now I want to take on stained glass making. New hobby unlocked.

I broke it down like this to understand.

Hopefully it helps:

For Freedom of Thought (FOT) to be a precursor to Intellectual Progress, (IP) you must use the following conditional statement:

FOT -> IP

But since FOT causes the Pursuit of Ideas (POI). You end up with:

FOT -> POI-> IP

However, you CAN`T have FOT and Intellectual Discipline (ID) at the same time. They directly contradict each other per their definitions. Since So:

FOT -> NOT ID

Where you have freedom of thought you can`t have intellectual discipline is answer C.

Please tell me if this makes sense.

If other insects similar to bees do not NEED to perceive an object's color. Then the other thing, the flower, must have NEEDED to change somehow to cause the bee to develop a response to flower color. Imagine you have a bee and a dragonfly, and they both can see flowers but pollinate indiscriminately. The evolutionary advantage would be more favorable for the flower to change than the bee because the flower wants the bee to come closer/pollinate it more often.

@Stas1973 I think this leads you to the same thing as the email information but you have to use your LSAC account to gain access. https://www.lsac.org/reimagining-legal-education/strategy-booster

Kevinnn. Hopefully I can score nearly as well as you!

I work full-time and commute an hour and a half each way (3 hours total), luckily no longer every day. However, I try to do a few drills during my lunch break. I would go into my car when I worked in a cubicle so I would have some privacy. Other times, I would stay a bit later in the office and study a bit there to help bypass rush hour traffic. Now that I can partially work from home, I scheduled most of my study time on those days, but I try my best to study on the weekends. On Saturday, a few hours in the morning, and then a break in the afternoon, and I will study again in the evening, and on Sunday, just a few hours in the afternoon. I am not a super big fan of study podcasts but if you have a longer commute like me, that could be helpful. I prefer audiobooks and TedTalks to keep me engaged. Hope this helps!

That would be so nice! It`s one thing to know the accuracy, but it would be great to see the timing as well.

Replacing the words "cats" and "mammals" in the sentence structure (or simplified version) has really helped me keep these straight. I just line it up and if it follows logically then I know its correct. (if I did it right).