With hindsight it’s pretty easy. It’s saying not consult> not release. A says release> consult. Correct.

Terrible explanation to a 30% question.

Only a broad jumper can make a leap this big.

@CeciliaBurton1 brutal section.

This was an unusually difficult section.

Only got this one through POE

@JacksonRose great breakdown. Thank you.

The fact that they wrote near a river helped me identify the assumption fast. I immediately thought well what if the river brought the tools there from another location at a different time.

If you diagram this question you see the other choices are not logically possible.

@KR c is wrong because it reverses the logic it’s taking a condition : if A>B and saying if B>A

Had no idea this was a 1 star, skipped it initially because I knew it would be a time suck, when I went back to it at the end had only 30 sec to answer. I skimmed the stimulus saw conditional reasoning and chose E based on that. Prob not smart to do on the actual test.

This question is insane! I figured C was the right answer but I kept thinking in JY’s voice “who cares what humans do!”

@arose same

Can someone explain to me how you’re supposed to answer this question in 34 seconds ?

@BenPocheron down to 37% now

My dumbass brain confused nocturnal with hibernation for some reason.

This is not a 3/5. It’s atleast a 4/5.

@calliekoskovich do you have any tips to breakdown arguments and restate them like you do?

On these types of questions I’m starting with answer E to save time. They almost always bury the right answer in E to make you kill time diagramming the other choices.

Isn’t this also stated as

RL>IF>SI>GL

If you have rule of law you have individual freedom then you have social integrity.

Is this question really supposed to be answered in 30 seconds? I fail to see how that’s possible.