Self-study
RyanConnor
- Joined
- Jan 2026
- Subscription
- Core
Admissions profile
LSAT
169
CAS GPA
3.76
1L START YEAR
2027
Applications
Berkeley
In process
Berkeley
In process
Boston College
In process
Boston College
In process
Boston University
In process
Boston University
In process
Columbia
In process
Columbia
In process
Cornell
In process
Cornell
In process
Duke
In process
Duke
In process
Fordham
In process
Fordham
In process
Georgetown
In process
Georgetown
In process
George Washington
In process
George Washington
In process
Georgia
In process
Georgia
In process
Michigan
In process
Michigan
In process
Minnesota
In process
Minnesota
In process
Northwestern
In process
Northwestern
In process
Notre Dame
In process
Notre Dame
In process
NYU
In process
NYU
In process
Texas A&M
In process
Texas A&M
In process
UCLA
In process
UCLA
In process
UNC
In process
UNC
In process
USC
In process
USC
In process
UT Austin
In process
UT Austin
In process
UVA
In process
UVA
In process
Vanderbilt
In process
Vanderbilt
In process
WashU
In process
WashU
In process
Discussions
RyanConnor
Friday, Mar 6
This question should be struck ... to say that C weakens the argument is inane and irrelevant for the LSAT. They've clearly stated evidence pointing to the actuaries; whether there are 2 actuaries or 100, the numbers make no difference. Are we supposed to judge the percentage change in the likelihood that it's an actuary vs. the number of people employed? No. That's moronic. Maybe there are more actuaries contracted out by the company ... maybe the actuaries were all hired in the last month ... maybe the world is made of pudding -- who knows ?
Hi michaeljohnson3292