😛

This question should be struck ... to say that C weakens the argument is inane and irrelevant for the LSAT. They've clearly stated evidence pointing to the actuaries; whether there are 2 actuaries or 100, the numbers make no difference. Are we supposed to judge the percentage change in the likelihood that it's an actuary vs. the number of people employed? No. That's moronic. Maybe there are more actuaries contracted out by the company ... maybe the actuaries were all hired in the last month ... maybe the world is made of pudding -- who knows ?