@RobertWay The revisionist historians made a claim but the sentence that uses the word "propagandist" is not refuting that claim. The sentence is simply saying how objective historians should be/see themselves.

If it were refuting the claim it would have to somehow say that ascribing different meanings to past events does not mean that the events themselves lack absolute meanings. The sentence with the word "propagandist" does nothing to this end.

Simply put, the sentence is not a response to the claim.

Isnt A also wrong because the passage doesnt say anything about how quickly/readily negative info can be positively framed? I eliminated it instantly based on this but maybe i shouldnt have.